Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Connor: Don't call us 'activist judges'(The Old Bag Speaks)
CNN ^ | 10/27/2006 | Bill Mears

Posted on 10/27/2006 1:31:57 PM PDT by tobyhill

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sandra Day O'Connor noticed a disturbing development as her last day on the Supreme Court neared. Over her final years on the bench, more people were talking about "activist judges," an issue she said that appeared to be "erupting all over the country."

"That seemed to be a mantra of some kind," she told CNN.

Members of the Supreme Court are a notoriously press-shy, but O'Connor, who retired in January, and Justice Stephen Breyer, a 13-year veteran, recently spoke candidly to CNN about their concerns about judicial independence and political retribution against judges. (Watch O'Connor bemoan the rhetoric on 'activist judges' -- 2:10)

"I saw increasing indicators of unhappiness with judges," O'Connor told CNN's Jeffrey Toobin as part of the network's "Broken Government" series. "We heard all kinds of statements by members of Congress, by state legislators. We saw legislation introduced to somehow restrict or affect judges at both the state and federal levels."

O'Connor's bluntness was tempered somewhat by Breyer's thoughtfulness

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activist; activistjudges; judges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2006 1:31:59 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Truth hurts hmm Ms Sell out?


2 posted on 10/27/2006 1:32:37 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Don't be activist and you won't be called that. Easy fix.


3 posted on 10/27/2006 1:32:52 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Loosen up, Sandy baby. You're too tight.


4 posted on 10/27/2006 1:33:42 PM PDT by RichInOC (...John Riggins, a role model for us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Over her final years on the bench, more people were talking about "activist judges," an issue she said that appeared to be "erupting all over the country."

Actually it is being replaced with "black robed tyrants" to keep up with current rulings.

5 posted on 10/27/2006 1:34:11 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Snap,bang or fizz works for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So tell us about the latest judicially-forced same-sex "union" legislation out of the New Jersey Supreme Court, former Justice O'Connor? What do you call that? I call it "judicial activism."


6 posted on 10/27/2006 1:34:25 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

It still stuns me that most of the Supreme's are picked by Republican Presidents. I guess that they have some of the blame.


7 posted on 10/27/2006 1:35:56 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Sandy Baby, the highlight of your life was a drunken John Riggins calling you Sandy baby. It was all downhill since then.


8 posted on 10/27/2006 1:36:27 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Hey, is Sandra doesn't like "judicial activism" she can call it any darn thing she likes. Its still an abuse of power.


9 posted on 10/27/2006 1:36:36 PM PDT by The Blitherer (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"Someone has to have the last word."

I think that "someone" is supposed to be the people

10 posted on 10/27/2006 1:37:41 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
If you can quote and exact article and section of the Constitution to back up your ruling you aren't an activist. If you have to play Shadow Puppet Theather with the Constitution to find the penumbral eminations you need to make your ruling then you are and activist judge.
11 posted on 10/27/2006 1:38:08 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Do not remove this tagline under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

nannie nannie nannie goat....free speech baby


12 posted on 10/27/2006 1:38:28 PM PDT by RacerX1128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If the old bag wasn't a LIEberal activist, she'd have RETIRED already.


13 posted on 10/27/2006 1:39:38 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

God bless Ronald Reagan for all of his great deeds, but when it came to SCOTUS appointments, he had a 67% failure rate (O'Connor & Tony Kennedy).


14 posted on 10/27/2006 1:40:21 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

It's LONG PAST DUE to challenge these BLACK ROBED TERRORIST LAWYERS for thier attacks on American values and traditions.

Only SATAN could call the millions upon millions of innocent, helpless, and defenseless humans a "choice." Onlly an insane black robed lawyer could decide to DEFY the very government OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, and FOR THE PEOPLE by mandating that we must accept perversity and homosexuality AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE!

Truly, O'Connor is a black robed lawyer terrorist and should have never been on the bench to begin with!


15 posted on 10/27/2006 1:41:32 PM PDT by woodb01 (ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: digger48
BINGO! If everything is supposed to be "minority rights" then the legislator should just do the opposite of the majority of the publics wishes and then the USSC would rule against them but in favor of the majority.
17 posted on 10/27/2006 1:43:17 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Calling her an old bag is a bit much. She at least retired when President Bush had a chance to replace her, not hanging on until the bitter end like Stevens.


18 posted on 10/27/2006 1:44:02 PM PDT by Romney08 (Saxton For Oregon Governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

I'm just thankful the wicked witch had to leave her post.

What she says and thinks is no longer important to the judicial
nor to myself.


19 posted on 10/27/2006 1:44:24 PM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

She actually said "I saw increasing indicators of unhappiness..."?

LOL. The woman sounds as shrill as Algore or Billary. Who the hell talks like that?

Perhaps the indicators of unhappiness would decrease if she would shut the hell up.


20 posted on 10/27/2006 1:44:46 PM PDT by dashing doofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson