"City Solicitor Romulo L. Diaz Jr" was a Clinton appointee to the EPA back in 1998...
http://yosemite1.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/b1ab9f485b098972852562e7004dc686/ef276ef316df8baa8525664400709340?OpenDocument
1 posted on
10/27/2006 8:40:37 PM PDT by
Tamzee
To: Tamzee
It's very intimidating when a corpse has to answer these questions just to vote.
2 posted on
10/27/2006 8:44:01 PM PDT by
kinoxi
To: Tamzee
This would only be a concern if someone planned to cheat!
5 posted on
10/27/2006 8:54:22 PM PDT by
TheLion
To: Tamzee
If this is accurate, then the topic is highly suspicious. Americans should generally approve of monitors. It helps dissuade theories of ballot-stuffing, along with actually cases of it.
7 posted on
10/27/2006 8:56:18 PM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( Creationists should respond kindly to Macroevolutionists, even if hard (not being hypocritical).)
To: Tamzee
Of course they do ... they can't cheat if they're monitored.
10 posted on
10/27/2006 9:00:31 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Tamzee
So, the poor and elderly, besides getting the willies over the carrying of identification cards, also will be kept from voting by the presence of "officials" within the voting area?
Why do I get the feeling here that the Democrats are covering up much more than they let on?
Actually, when have the Democrats ever cared about the poor, the elderly and minorities except when it comes time to tally votes?
11 posted on
10/27/2006 9:09:12 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(In God we trust. All others we monitor.)
To: Tamzee
(Illegal Immigrants + Democrats + minorities) = Vote Fraud
No exceptions. No corrective action..
No voter I.D., No proof of citizenship...
Mustn't intimidate the illegal voting sonsuvbitches, the Democrats rely upon them.
Since the Republicans have been unsuccessful in correcting this KNOWN and DANGEROUS situation -- if they're beat by illegal voting and fraud - they deserve it, but the Republic doesn't.
Semper Fi
12 posted on
10/27/2006 9:36:21 PM PDT by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Tamzee
If nobody commits fraud, then whats the problem with monitors???
Maybe if your 'dead' and voting, your afraid someone will recongize you? If your a 'prisoner' your afraid someone will recongize you? Well then, your got a problem don't you?
14 posted on
10/27/2006 9:45:50 PM PDT by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Tamzee
BTTT
15 posted on
10/27/2006 10:09:07 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
To: Tamzee
But City Solicitor Romulo L. Diaz Jr. said at a news conference Thursday that the federal government could not guarantee him that federal monitors wouldn't follow voters into polling booths. It would be better to appoint local monitors, he said. So, they're not objecting to monitors, just federal ones? They'd rather have local monitors, presumably people they can control?
-PJ
To: Tamzee
If you are not guilty of anything then you should have nothing to fear. Since you fear, you are guilty.
23 posted on
10/28/2006 12:15:40 AM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson