Replies

WHAT HAS HILLARY DONE FOR NEW YORK?

A question that an objective media would and should be exploring regularly, especially by directly challenging the candidate.

Of course there is no objective media, only fellow travellers and fifth columnists.

A question that an invigorated opposition would and should be paying to deliver, but Hillary has no meaningful opposition.

We are left then only to perhaps vainly hope, that some natural instinct, some long denied inner voice, of the once proud, once justifiably proud New York voters, will have quietly muttered the defining question of this Year's senatorial election, and that amoung a majority of those who vote, the question will have been answered honestly, from their own knowledge and experience, unmoved by media distortions and distractions and unswayed by focus group tested slogans, and paid propaganda.

Sen. Clinton it is obvious is devoted only to the acquisition of personal power and will tell any lie, and live any charade to hold and acquire political power.

If New Yorkers return this calculating opportunist to the national stage under a banner of their endorsement, they, more than anyone, shall be responsible for the continuing malfeasence, misfeasence and non-feasence that are the hallmarks of any Clinton occupation of office. At a time such as this, when Western Civilisation is under assault by a facist religious movement that supports execution of women who dare to avail themselves of the services of a hairdresser (Taliban policy), those whose loyalties remain fixed in reactionary support of tired political allegiences born of patronage, the unions, the tort lawyers, the welfare state, the communist journalists, the professional left, need to wake up and realize their survival too is at stake. If not, they deserve to be treated as supporters of our terrorist enemies, which is what they will have become, if they allow HRC to remain in political office.