Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

£3.68 trillion: The price of failing to act on climate change
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 10/29/06 | Gaby Hinsliff

Posted on 10/28/2006 6:01:23 PM PDT by Pokey78

Landmark report reveals apocalyptic cost of global warming

Britons face the prospect of a welter of new green taxes to tackle climate change, as the most authoritative report on global warming warns it will cost the world up to £3.68 trillion unless it is tackled within a decade.

The review by Sir Nicholas Stern, commissioned by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and published tomorrow, marks a crucial point in the debate by underlining how failure to act would trigger a catastrophic global recession. Unchecked climate change would turn 200 million people into refugees, the largest migration in modern history, as their homes succumbed to drought or flood.

Stern also warns that a successor to the Kyoto agreement on cutting greenhouse gas emissions should be signed next year, not by 2010/11 as planned. He forecasts that the world needs to spend 1 per cent of global GDP - equivalent to about £184bn - dealing with climate change now, or face a bill between five and 20 times higher for damage caused by letting it continue. Unchecked climate change could thus cost as much as £566 for every man, woman and child now on the planet - roughly 6.5 billion people.

(Excerpt) Read more at observer.guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2006 6:01:24 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

More unfettered affluvia from across the pond.


2 posted on 10/28/2006 6:02:52 PM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Charge it to the Sun's bank account.

It's responsible for the warming.


3 posted on 10/28/2006 6:05:27 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Somebody's gonna get that money so it might as well be me. I guess air conditioning and life rafts will be where most of it goes. I'm quitting to sell these starting Monday.


4 posted on 10/28/2006 6:05:29 PM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hgro

Alright, lets all switch to tricycles. Al, you first.


5 posted on 10/28/2006 6:05:56 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Incredible - does anyone really take this stuff seriously?
6 posted on 10/28/2006 6:06:22 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Yep! All we need is money to avert this "crises".

Step right up folks and pony up. One way or another, we'll get you!

7 posted on 10/28/2006 6:06:57 PM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

As usual, overestimates abound. Why, nuclear winter can be had for a song - a cure for what heats you if there ever was one! In fact, it is a race between NK and Iran as to who gets to deliver first. As they say on the launch pad, "in work." Of course, simply wait until the sun enters its cooling cycle and the global warming generators will look positively prescient.


8 posted on 10/28/2006 6:07:09 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

No, not air-conditioners. The freon! Bad. We'll all be going without air-conditioners.


9 posted on 10/28/2006 6:07:47 PM PDT by jwalburg (It wasn't the Executive that Thomas Jefferson referred to as "the Despotic Branch.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I am all for every country except the US signing this. After they have all come into compliance (ditch the exemption for China and India), then we can discuss it.

As it stands now, there are three classes of nations.

1) China and India are exempted so will face no cost at all.

2) Europeans and their pals will sign it and ignore it with impunity as they have done to date.

3) The US, should we be foolish enough to become a part of this clown parade. The US will have all the rest of the world and our very own liberals demanding full compliance with every measure immediately, bashing American business, and forcing America into a recession. All for something that may well be useless in the first place.

Kyoto has more to do with slowing the US economy than it does with anything else.


10 posted on 10/28/2006 6:09:05 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
£3.68 trillion

£3.68 trillion? And what, 1£ = 0.5 Eyetalian lira? That would make it about $167? (Please do correct my arithmetic, if you can.) We can live with that.

11 posted on 10/28/2006 6:09:28 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

$9.72 trillion. That's the cost of implementing Kyoto, and that doesn't count the costs of deaths from starvation and disease brought on by those policies.

Oh, and Kyoto won't make anything better, since man isn't causing global warming, but if you believe in the bogus numbers of this report you have to add them on top of the $9.72 trillion cost of Kyoto.


12 posted on 10/28/2006 6:09:32 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

A more intellectualy honest report would have been the cost of implimenting all the false eco-programs that yeild little benefit and do NOTHING for their global warming religion.


13 posted on 10/28/2006 6:09:50 PM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
£3.68 trillion: The price of failing pretending to act on climate change

There, all fixed now.

14 posted on 10/28/2006 6:11:40 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Oh yeah?! Well, well, then climate change is going to cost 100 million billion trillion quadillion sextillion dollars.

Fund our research!!


15 posted on 10/28/2006 6:13:00 PM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Da Mav

There are measures far cheaper than 1 Tr. that would cool the earth far beyond man's alleged contribution to warmings. One is dumping iron in the ocean so it absorbs co2


16 posted on 10/28/2006 6:13:31 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Doh! Freon... yes, no air-conditioner sales. I guess it'll be trillions spent on life rafts and deodorant then. I'm starting tomorrow.
17 posted on 10/28/2006 6:15:56 PM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I can turn lead into gold overnight too 8) Im just certain of that ...we need this sruff ya know


18 posted on 10/28/2006 6:29:45 PM PDT by Tigen (Live in peace or rest in peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; DaveLoneRanger

If I were you, I'd invest in Colorado property about 2000' up. In ten years, you'll be able to say you own Rocky Mountain Island beach-front.


19 posted on 10/28/2006 6:30:11 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Da Mav; Phsstpok
Kyoto has everything to do with creating a socialist global wealth redistribution scheme. Do some research on Maurice Strong, the architect of Kyoto.

The senate voted 95-0 against this POS in 1997 too.
20 posted on 10/28/2006 6:34:07 PM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson