Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Sometimes a big hill is just a big hill.

and occasionally they aren't -- the mud brick pyramids and ziggurats of mesopotamia and persia mostly look like symmetrical hills now -- and they could be quite tall. The ziggurat on top of which the temple to marduk in Babylon was built was 91 meters tall (incidentally its name, Etemenanki, means "House of the foundation of Heaven on Earth" and it may be the basis for the story of the Tower of Babel). In fact, one complex of ziggurats in Iran (I cannot recall its name right now; I'll try to find it again) was discovered because a western archaeologist went to the valley they were in following reports that the locals downstream of several symmetrical hills were able to collect gold artifacts after seasonal floods.

I'm not saying that this is necessarily a valid discovery; only time will tell that. But many old manmade structures are now only suspiciously shaped mounds and hills.
11 posted on 10/29/2006 4:11:27 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: verum ago
...and occasionally they aren't...

And sometimes a big hill isn't a big hill. True. We'll have to wait and see what develops from this dig. I hope they can find the funding to pursue it.

14 posted on 10/29/2006 4:52:45 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Mathemeticians are machines that turn coffee into theorems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago; festus; thubb

I also saw the TV show last night. The interesting thing was that apparently there may be three pyramids. You may recall the guy who discovered that the pyramids if Giza seem to be in the same position as the stars of Orion's belt. Something similar in Bosnia? This is so large I would be surprised if the entire hill was man made, but perhaps people took an existing hill, squared it a bit and put a pyramid symetrically on top.

Some years ago a saw an article in National Geographic about a 50 foot high mound in Bulgaria that had been examined. There was pottery from either 6,000 + years ago or 6,000 BC, I don't remember which. It was very colorful and varied. Then pottery from 3,000 year later was very dull, well formed, but lacking any joy or enthusiasm. My thought when I saw the difference, was "what on earth happened to these poor people." I don't have a map in front of me, but I think these two places are close enough to each other to have traded and influenced each other. Also if the older date is the correct one, I wonder the eruption of Mt. Mazama (Crater Lake, USA) could have caused a major climate change.


20 posted on 10/29/2006 9:50:52 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson