Hillary's High School Photo (you be the judge)

It does not look bad. The photo of her in high school if fine. What's wrong with it?

121 posted on 10/30/2006 5:58:45 AM PST by BJungNan

To: Texas_shutterbug

She us ugly inside. Usually that is where Ugly is found.

122 posted on 10/30/2006 5:59:20 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")

123 posted on 10/30/2006 5:59:44 AM PST by BJungNan

124 posted on 10/30/2006 6:01:38 AM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of an 2 year old son with Down Syndrome)

I think she's quite pretty in that HS picture.

I hate her politics, but that doesn't make her ugly (45 years ago).

125 posted on 10/30/2006 6:02:00 AM PST by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)

Eh... needs a bit more eyebrow sculping, but seen far worse.. that pic of her and bill together in College.. now that ones scary.

126 posted on 10/30/2006 6:03:06 AM PST by HamiltonJay

so then why do some women age like fine wine (bo dereck, sophia loren, linda evens)

and others turn to potato sack shapeless blobs with facial hair

At the gym there are women in their 30's-50's which have well formed physiques as any 20 year old. Why do women let themselves go?

127 posted on 10/30/2006 6:03:10 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)

To: Las Vegas Dave

What did I do to you?!

128 posted on 10/30/2006 6:04:07 AM PST by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)

"Stop it! Just stop it!! How dare you insult Her Heinous this way!"

*sob*

129 posted on 10/30/2006 6:06:23 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God." (Psalm 53:1))

It would be interesting to see how cute all the FReepers are

130 posted on 10/30/2006 6:07:38 AM PST by Running On Empty

Rather average looking. I don't think she is unattractive (based strictly on the photo). I do not believe she has had "millions of dollars worth of plastic surgery". But if I found out her side planted that as if it was from the opposition in order to derail them it would not suprise me.

131 posted on 10/30/2006 6:08:21 AM PST by 70times7 (Sense... some don't make any, some don't have any - or so the former would appear to the latter.)

132 posted on 10/30/2006 6:10:23 AM PST by Doc Savage ("You couldn't tame me, but you taught me.................")

This just in from the liberal New York Post, which also endorsed Eliot Spitzer for NYS governor today:

CLINTON: 12 MORE YEARS

October 30, 2006 -- The Post today also endorses Hillary Rodham Clinton for re-election to the United States Senate.

Surprised?

Well, so are we - a little.

But, then, there really isn't much of a choice in this race.

Clinton has an insurmountable lead in the polls. She's worked hard the last six years, and it shows.

And the Republican candidate, John Spencer, isn't a credible alternative.

He's a down-to-earth, if not earthy, fellow who once served Yonkers well as mayor and who now appears to be running for another term in that office.

If so, we endorse him - for mayor.

As for Mrs. Clinton, well, she's been a pretty good senator - popular with her colleagues and as productive as a first-term legislator from the minority party probably can be.

Think of her as Sen. Pothole Redux (apologies to Alfonse D'Amato).

Meanwhile, her positions on numerous issues - particularly involving national security - have been much closer to the political center than we would have expected.

That's not to say that some of her positions haven't already begun "evolving" toward the Democrats' party line - especially on Iraq, where she has slowly, but surely, begun inching her way over to the "Bush lied" crowd.

For now, however, the fact remains that she has been, to repeat, a pretty good senator.

But what about the question of the hour?

What about the White House?

Well, New Yorkers simply expect their major officeholders to be presidential aspirants - and the pols always rise to the bait (occasionally delivering ludicrous results; has anyone seen George Pataki in New York lately?).

So Hillary's caught the bug.

So what?

But we think she's done such a good job these last six years that she'd do well to serve six more. If not 12.

Re-elect Hillary.

In 2012.

Comment: I shall now proceed to take six showers for having touched this paper today.

134 posted on 10/30/2006 6:14:50 AM PST by OESY

135 posted on 10/30/2006 6:17:37 AM PST by monkapotamus

GUILTY! Oh, wait - wrong thread...

136 posted on 10/30/2006 6:21:48 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)

How did she become so homely so quickly? Her high school picture must have been touched up. Photographers used to do that years ago if you wanted certain areas changed.

137 posted on 10/30/2006 6:24:01 AM PST by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)

All pigs are cute when they are young.

138 posted on 10/30/2006 6:28:27 AM PST by MAWG

To: Running On Empty

You can click on my screen name and see my current photo. I graduated from HS the same year.

139 posted on 10/30/2006 6:29:51 AM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)

.....when I was pretty. "Well, you ain't now", quiped my 8 year old grandson. This was just last Saturday.

By the way, I'm 62.

Wonder what "pretty" is in his mind?? I never asked......He might have ripped everyone.

140 posted on 10/30/2006 6:41:09 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794