[perfect_rovian_storm]

Yes, lets do that. You say we have a chance at what? Losing 18 house seats? And that's WITH our 'superior ground game'. Only in a DUer's wet dream. I frankly don't believe you that you've analyzed anything and come up with those numbers.

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

"You say we have a chance at what?"


At offsetting the Dems lead in these 18 races with a superior get out the vote effort. We ALWAYS organize this effort better on election night and I could possibly offset a Dem lead in the total likely voter population.<

I can list the 18 I think we'll lose if you like. /p>

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

I hope I'm wrong, but these are the 18 that it's looks like we could lose.

1. AZ-08
2. CO-07
3. CT-02
4. CT-04
5. FL-13
6. FL-16
7. IA-01
8. IN-02
9. IN-08
10. IN-09
11. MN-06
12. NC-11
13. NY-24
14. NY-26
15. OH-15
16. PA-06
17. PA-07
18. PA-10

[Private_Sector_Does_It_Better]

I said: "Let's talk again on election night and we'll see who is more thoughtful."

You said: "Yes, lets do that... Losing 18 house seats? And that's WITH our 'superior ground game'. Only in a DUer's wet dream"

I wish I had been wrong, but I wasn't. You attacked me for being correct. My goal as a conservative is not to blindly "believe", but to accurately predict what is going to happen.