Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: W04Man

Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable. Anyone with a chronic illness who depends on medication to function normally knows that it isn't always possible to time it perfectly. Whether Fox could have timed the filming of the commercial better or not, we don't know, but his suffering is real. Rush's identification of the Republican party with mockery of a disability and failure to show compassion showed an appalling lack of judgment.


8 posted on 10/31/2006 5:45:27 AM PST by edweena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: edweena

It will be interesting to see if Rush talks about this on his show or lets this story die.


10 posted on 10/31/2006 5:47:16 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
Whether Fox could have timed the filming of the commercial better or not, we don't know.

Yes we do. This was taped and he could have chosen to do it when his symptoms were more under control. This was intentional. Everyone sympathizes with those suffering from awful afflictions like this, but we do not have to be sypathetic over his USING his disease to get dems elected on the incredibly insulting premise that Republicans don't care about alieviating suffering. Fox chose to lie about Talent's position on stem cell research. Nobody should get a pass for that.

16 posted on 10/31/2006 5:52:14 AM PST by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

Rush should have stuck to the lies in the ad and not gone into Fox's physical symptoms.


17 posted on 10/31/2006 5:52:25 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
I agree with you. Rush's mocking of Fox was beneath contempt, the kind of thing you'd expect from a 14 year old.

While there would have been several ways to make a reasoned argument against the Fox spots--such as pointing out the indignity of using one's illness to promote a medical practice that destroys potential human life, Rush just shows his own shallowness and insecurity by acting like the clown gasbag he has become. Indefensible.

18 posted on 10/31/2006 5:52:38 AM PST by NetLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

Timing is exactly the issue. Timed just so to make Republicans appear cold and unconcerned. It was disingenuous and it should not be allowed to stand. It was a lie. Fox put himself up as the poster boy for a proposal that he hasn't read.....he was just out to help Dems and hurt Reps. He had to have had control over the whole commercial. He is the star! Your response is like asking someone if they STILL beat their spouse. It hamstrings those that are on the opposite side of Fox's party. That was no doubt the intention in using Fox and his presence all over the country.


19 posted on 10/31/2006 5:56:32 AM PST by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

IMHO.... You are off base in using the word "Mocking." The ad was a "Mockery."


23 posted on 10/31/2006 6:00:37 AM PST by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE CONTINUE ON TO VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

I agree. However, M.J. Fox's decision to film a television commercial in favor of a piece of legislation that he admittedly hadn't read shows equally poor judgment. Even sadder, if our society placed an appropriate amount of value on being an informed citizen, and thinking through issues, people wouldn't be swayed one way or another by what a celebrity said.


26 posted on 10/31/2006 6:09:48 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
According to Rush.. he acted out Michaels mannerisms so his video audience could see how he appeared in the ad. In it's context, I have no reason to believe it was intentional malice.
27 posted on 10/31/2006 6:11:47 AM PST by divine_moment_of_facts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable.

True. Fortunately, that didn't happen here.
37 posted on 10/31/2006 6:19:27 AM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

"Mr. Fox admitted in his 2002 autobiography to going off his medication to appear more disabled before a 1999 Senate subcommittee appearance".

Period.


39 posted on 10/31/2006 6:20:18 AM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

Did you go off your meds?


45 posted on 10/31/2006 6:28:28 AM PST by TheConservator (Confutatis maledictis flammis acribus addictis. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
What diseases do you have that you are such an expert? He manipulated his disease and may cause himself irreparable harm by messing with the meds. He is also showing himself to be selfish,and tone deaf. If he is so in to ESCR then let him finance the program and let him and his wife and his Hollywood friends pump out all the Embryos themselves. If ESCR was promising they would be beating down the doors to finance and do the Research because of the money they could make instead of stealing tax payer dollars that could go for promising research. ESCR is not the answer and if he was anything but a a Liberal Dem touting other liberal dems he would research and know this. I have a number of Autoimmune Diseases,but I am not foolish enough to tout something that will cause tumors,not cures,and I certainly do not show the very worst of the symptoms to prostitute myself like he is doing. Stop blaming Rush for not being silent on this Democrat Prostitution ploy.
48 posted on 10/31/2006 6:32:53 AM PST by samantha (Cheer up,the Adults are in charge,but need reinforcements very soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
Anyone with a chronic illness who depends on medication to function normally knows that it isn't always possible to time it perfectly

Even the super-liberal Washington Post says Fox has been able to time his tapings.

Fox's scenes in "Boston Legal" had to be taped around his illness, as he worked to control the tremors associated with Parkinson's for limited periods of time."

52 posted on 10/31/2006 6:39:17 AM PST by syriacus (MJ Fox tells the US, "Show me you love me, baby, by obliterating the most vulnerable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

Don't be a shill.
Fox was making a political ad, and he is open to ridicule for the content and presentation in said ad especially because he exploited his disease to deliver a false message.
His suffering is real, I do not doubt that. But his hope is misplaced, and we are not obliged to support that.


53 posted on 10/31/2006 6:39:49 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
"Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable. Anyone with a chronic illness who depends on medication to function normally knows that it isn't always possible to time it perfectly."

I don't recall Rush or anybody else "mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled". What they did was call Fox to account for LYING about his symptoms by going off his meds (as he has himself admitted to doing) for political propaganda purposes.

54 posted on 10/31/2006 6:39:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

"Whether Fox could have timed the filming of the commercial better or not, we don't know" you see, that's the point, we DO know.


61 posted on 10/31/2006 6:51:30 AM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable.

There formerly were popular attractions known as "sideshows", wherein people with physical abnormalities would exhibit themselves for money. When Fox chose to make himself into a sideshow geek to elicit political gain, he thrust himself onto the stage. If he can't take counter criticism, then it is too late to hide behind his infirmity.

He is simply the latest in a long line of political shills who whore out their misfortune for political gain. The "Jersey Girls", Cindy Sheehan, the Kennedy Clan, etc. are tragedy whores.

64 posted on 10/31/2006 6:56:23 AM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena
Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable.

Neither is lying about what Rush did.

66 posted on 10/31/2006 7:00:24 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

" Mocking the pathological symptoms of someone who is disabled is simply unacceptable "

If Rush had imitated how Fox looked on a tv show or walking down the street- that might have been gratuitous mocking.
But, he did no such thing.
Rush described a political ad for those who had not seen it.
I did the same thing for my wife because she had not yet seen the ad.
At no time in any of the discussions on any of the threads or on Rush's show has anyone mocked Fox's illness-in fact, he's received tremendous sympathy and well wishes.
What we mock is Fox's participation in a blatant misrepresentation of the truth.


72 posted on 10/31/2006 7:12:11 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: edweena

Rush did it ONLY on his PROPRIETARY webcam. He was showing HIS viewers what the add looked like!!!

It was a pretty accurate reenactment.

You are grossly ignorant.


75 posted on 10/31/2006 7:29:37 AM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson