Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another point

The ecomonic models all assume little dynamic effects from global warming mitigation. The price of electricy and other carbon-based products will increase substantially, and decrease the world GNPby who knows how much. World recessions are not discussed but probable. Also the indivdual's behavior will change with higher prices and energy use will decline.

1 posted on 11/02/2006 11:02:23 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Raven
See also the WSJ editorial
2 posted on 11/02/2006 11:05:57 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven; DaveLoneRanger

ping


3 posted on 11/02/2006 11:17:29 AM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

I didn't know Howard was getting into economic news like this. I'm impressed.


4 posted on 11/02/2006 11:34:02 AM PST by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
But he assumes that we will continue to pump out carbon far into the 22nd century--a rather unlikely scenario given the falling cost of alternative fuels, and especially if some of his predictions become clear to us toward the end of this century. Thus he estimates that the higher temperatures of eight degrees Celsius in the 2180s will be very damaging, costing 11% to 14% of GDP.

This is a hoot. These guys are actually making GDP calculations 175 years out. Idiocy. That would be like the Andy Jackson administration getting together with King William IV of England to plan economic policy for today. It generally takes economists a year to figure out what really happened in the previous year, and somehow they expect us to take them seriously when the are throwing around predictions for an economy six generations in the future.

6 posted on 11/02/2006 12:00:36 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
The review correctly points out that climate change is a real problem, and that it is caused by human greenhouse-gas emissions.

Well they got it half right. Once again, their basic premise is based upon junk science and still highly inaccurate models... and they move on from there.

7 posted on 11/02/2006 12:34:26 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; ...

PING!


8 posted on 11/02/2006 1:05:32 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Mashed potatoes, gravy, and cranberry sauce! Wooooooo-oooooooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

BTTT.


9 posted on 11/02/2006 2:56:36 PM PST by Buzwardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Global Warming plays well in the West but is a dead letter in the Third World. China, India and other developing countries are not going to forsake the benefits of economic modernization in exchange for some theoretical reduction in global temperatures that will not be realized in the lifetime of those living and their immediate descendents.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

10 posted on 11/02/2006 6:45:10 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson