These VERY SAME News organizations went out of thier way just a few short months ago to DENY that these Docs had anything of Importance in them, and there was NOTHING that could justify the War...
Read Scott Shane's Articles/Book on the subject.
IMO, we need to keep this as SIMPLE as possible, so it gets the largest possible distribution.
"NEW YORK TIMES MISTAKENLY VALIDATES BUSH'S REASONS FOR WAR IN IRAQ!"
There...
That should do it...
Here's a Reuters Story on this subject:
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID=2006-11-03T044918Z_01_N02171090_RTRIDST_0_OUKIN-UK-SECURITY-INTERNET-IRAQ.XML
"...in recent weeks, according to the Times, the site posted documents that weapons experts said contained detailed accounts of Iraq's secret nuclear research before the 1991 Gulf War that one diplomat called "a cookbook" for building an atom bomb."