it doesn;t really matter anyway...anyone that follows this knows saddam wanted WMD and had every intention of restarting his program If/when the UN left(its in the Kay report) he was also in violation of the cease fire acreement becuase he didn't reveal all his duel use stuff(again in the kay report)
But this is too complicated for the avergere Joe to piece together in part becuase of the dimwits spin...if there isn't a pile of nuclear bombs or chemicals weaopns with a sign on them that says "saddams WMD" ....they won't get it
I disagree.....if there is a "whiff" of Saddam had nukes.....average Joe WILL get it.....at least that's what I think. Average Joe doesn't care about 1991....because I believe average Joe believes if Saddam had them in 1991....he probably had them later too....they're not THAT stupid.
Nite all.
Do not underestimate the American people. Here's the bottom line that the NYT cannot get around. They're claiming that this info would be extremely dangerous in Iran's hands. That means they are tacitly admitting that the same info was equally dangerous in Saddam's hands, where it would still be, YEARS after we deposed Saddam had we not taken him out.