Posted on 11/04/2006 8:07:04 AM PST by BMC1
If you can't handle the truth, go to a left wing website.
Join another party then becuae you shortsightedness will only help the donks which are traitors to this country.
Convincing people to vote republican is wise. Attempting to purge the party 3 days before a tight election is idiotic.
Well, that convinced me.
The breakdown is:
38 Will definetly vote for Rick {plus spouses and relatives}
8 not home left messages
2 Disconnected numbers
2 going to vote bobby jr. These two losers wanted to waste my time and get into an arguement but I'm too busy to try and convert losers at this stage. I thanked them and made the next call.
Hey PA Residents, it's not too late for you to volunteer to make calls or poll watch, or drive people to the polls. Give Rick and Swann some help, the response is very good. Keep the faith, pray on Sunday and vote on Tuesday.
Exactly. We have some republicans running for re-election and some new candidates that are far from perfect for most of us, yet putting the donks in power is not the answer right now. Let's survive this election cycle, then we can work on these republicans.
The time to punish the Republican incumbent is in the primary!
Both the Democrats and Republicans are driving us toward a cliff. They just disagree about the speed. The Democrats want to go a lot faster. The Republicans a little more slowly. With the Republicans we will at least have more time to set things right before it's too late. Now is the time to stick with the party and then do some starting Nov. 8.
If a conservative decides to teach the Republican party a lesson on election day, he and his loved ones are going to pay the price for that lesson. The tuition for that lesson will be make Harvard tuition look like peanuts.
I voted last week. Had to vote for a couple of RINOs, which makes me sick, but there is no way I could vote for the Demoncrat candidates...no way.
LOL
Normally, the option to not vote, or vote for the Dem'crat, would be an adequate strategy to express dissatisfaction with a Republican officeholder with whom you may disagree. But there is an assumption that both Dem'crats and all Republicans are honestly representing the interests of US citizens. This has become less and less so in recent years.
If the Dem'crat IS elected to power, complaints and objections to his (or her) misuse of the office will go unheard, or no direct response is made to the one who complains. What does happen is that the dissident is persecuted in little ways, like his income taxes are audited, or a permit is delayed, or even a few rumors are started in the neighborhood, calling into question his behavior and civic responsibilities.
There is a popular belief that this has happened with Republican officeholders, and in some cases, this may be true. But the whole idea of less government intrusion into the affairs of the individual is that this sort of thing does NOT happen, so long as the citizen keeps the law. The Dem'crat, on the other hand, wants a profusion of laws, many of which, on close examination, are in direct contradiction to each other, so no matter how one may wish to keep within the law, some part of the statutory code is always being broken. But Dem'crats don't enforce the law, as long as they are not being troubled by dissidents, then they apply it selectively, as a means of suppressing the rabble-rousers.
The difference? Republican officeholders are at least somewhat responsive to the voices of their constituents, while Dem'crats are working with an agenda that is crafted elsewhere, and not revealed to the local voters. The Dem'crat almost always maintains a very good "service" center, where favors and monetary reimbursements are dispensed to assure the continued support of a good-sized core of voters, and a "listening" activity seems to be ready to accept requests, but complaining about the service, unh-uh. That buys the complainer endless trouble.
Eventually, the troublesome person moves elsewhere, or shuts up altogether.
Anybody recognize a pattern here?
"If a conservative decides to teach the Republican party a lesson on election day, he and his loved ones are going to pay the price for that lesson. The tuition for that lesson will be make Harvard tuition look like peanuts."
Unfortunately it's not just the country that is at stake, it is the lives of their children and grandchildren.
The democrats will get us all killed by playing defense with terrorists that hide in the shadows whom will wait to strike us and will have all the time in the world to plan their attacks because they are not afraid of being captured or killed. Republicans will keep us safe and capture or kill the terrorists. Big distinction.
Like I said posts like yours are even more tiresome. If this is tiresome for you, what the hell are you wasting your time on this post??????????????
So you can make the most of your question mark key.
Seriously, I know what is at stake in this election and I am very concerned. But vanities such as this does nothing but add noise to the dialogue and I wish it world just stop.
But in the interest of keeping your blood pressure low, I will stop now.
APf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.