[dforest]

Didnt read it and don't want to

[Dane]

I could really care less what the DC bubble crowd thinks. They have been wrong so many time before and tomorrow will be no different.

[Darkwolf377]

Nina Totenberg reminds me of Lilly Tomlin's telephone operator character so much I've never been able to take her seriously.

[A Citizen Reporter]

Is this going to be their last "prediction"?

Because I'm ready to make up my scorecard for Tuesday night.

[ConservativeDude]

For what it's worth, Kondracke nailed 1994 in his final predictions, when no one else predicted the GOP tsunami.

I hope he's wrong this time.

[IndyTiger]

Never will forget watching Washington Week in Review the weekend before the 1980 election. Two of the four panelists picked Carter to defeat Reagan. Couldn't believe it at the time.

[Utah Binger]

Columns and rows with headers are your best friends.

[Last Laugh]

Fox News had Dan Blather on this Saturday talking about Saddam.

Since FNC put a traitor like that on and took him seriously, I no longer trust any of their talking heads to know anything about politics. They only know DNC talking points.

If FNC thinks we should still believe they are fair and balanced, they've got another thing coming.

Now, I no longer have any television news to watch. Guess I'll keep in touch through Free Republic.

[FreedomNeocon]

More predictions from the know-nothings that up and down (INCLUDING FOX) had written off '04 even all the way up to and on election night.

[moose2004]

"Charles Krauthammer:

House: Democrats win 21 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Colby King:

House: Democrats gain “at least” 20 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Nina Totenberg:

House: Democrats pick up 20 to 25 seats Senate: 50-50 or Republicans hold by one"

Hate to say it but I actually agree with these predictions, especially Charles Krauthammer's. GOTV!

[tobyhill]

I just don't see it happening for the Rats in either the House or Senate. Of all the races that are at least toss-ups held by House Republicans there are only about a dozen then 8-10 lean Rat or heavy Rat which would mean that the Rats would have to sweep every race but history shows the incumbent win over 50% of the time of those that are at least toss-ups. The most I see the Rats gaining in the House is 11 seats and more than likely only about 8 seats.

[no dems]

C'mon Meg; we've got momentum and a little hope. Why are you posting this crap; to try and discourage us?

[sam_paine]

I thought it was a McLaughlin vs. Beltway Boys debate. That would've been good.

[OldFriend]

And why does Blankley prostitute himself sitting on a panel with O'Donnell and Clift? To say nothing of McLaughlin....uh. Not one worth the time.

[mad_as_he$$]

Way old news already! Things have changed today - interesting.