To: leda
Finally, somebody doesn't lump us with the damn boomers.
5 posted on
11/06/2006 7:56:43 PM PST by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: patton
I was born in 1964, and that pretty much sums me up.
To: patton
19 posted on
11/06/2006 8:06:25 PM PST by
Lurker
(“A liberal thinks they can sleep in and someone will cover their lame ass.” Ted Nugent)
To: patton
I was born in 1957, and I was, I am and I always will be a boomer. This Jones stuff is bull.
To: patton
Ain't that nice...far as I'm concerned, we always got the shorter end of the stick...
29 posted on
11/06/2006 8:13:04 PM PST by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: patton
"Finally, somebody doesn't lump us with the damn boomers."
Hello,
LOL!
Glad to be here, (born 1965), MOgirl
45 posted on
11/06/2006 8:24:41 PM PST by
MOgirl
(The Great Pumpkin did arrive....and he brought a PRESENT!!)
To: patton
... and desrcibes me better for certain ;)
i have never thought of myself as a boomer.
55 posted on
11/06/2006 8:30:05 PM PST by
leda
(Life is always what you make it!)
To: patton
THE definitive study on generational issues for the masses, Strauss and Howe, defined the baby boomer generation ending around 1960. As I recall, they said that the BB generation's defining event was Vietnam and that if you were born after 1960 it wasn't the biggest event for you and your cohorts. (They also started the BB generation as starting around 1943, noting that the generation didn't have to have been actually born after the war to be a part of it. More of a mindset than a physical birth date.)
But, as I recall, they tended to support the concept of the latter arriving BBs being more conservative than the early BBs.
So, while the article is correct in noting attitudes of latter BBs, I think they are in error in tying in early Gen Xers to latter BBs. While some overlap is always going to happen between those born on the cusp of a generational change, I think they go too far. Even the conservative, latter born BBs are not the same as the early Gen Xers that followed them.
To: patton
59 posted on
11/06/2006 8:32:30 PM PST by
sneakers
To: patton
I'm on the bottom end...and sometimes get lumped in with Xers. I don't have any love for them either.
To: patton
Finally, somebody doesn't lump us with the damn boomers. Can someone please cue that .gif of the 1950's people applauding ... please?
The difference between us and the boomers is that we grew up hearing our fathers growl at the TV screen (full of boomers protesting the war in Vietnam), "D--n dirty hippies ... get a job!"
That, and many of us are proud to say that our first vote in a Presidential election was for the greatest President of the 20th Century.
95 posted on
11/06/2006 10:09:39 PM PST by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: patton
Agreed. I spent all of Clinton's years in office opining that if he's the best my generation can come up with, we're sunk. Glad to hear I'm not in his generation, but have my own. :)
114 posted on
11/07/2006 3:02:56 AM PST by
kalee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson