To: Kaslin
I voted in PA this morning. The line was a little longer than usual, but I think it's because they went from a punch card system, to a color-in-the-dot paper system and it was taking people longer to do, and it was different than previous years.
I was voter #33 around 7:30 AM.
There really was only one "machine" and that was a scanner where you inserted your ballot after you voted. The poll worker standing at it said to another voter that the machine was not actually counting votes, but I don't know if that was true or not.
To: Mannaggia l'America
Same here...and I was voter #34 around 7:15. We also went from the mechanical voting machines to the EZ-scans. I think the machine should have been counting the votes as it accepted the paper ballots, otherwise why were the ballots bar-coded and individually numbered?
The judge said the largest turnout he had ever seen was 2004, and this day was starting our exactly the same. We needed a presidential level turnout, and at least in red southeast PA we are getting it.
66 posted on
11/07/2006 12:00:30 PM PST by
Sisku Hanne
(Win, Diana Irey! Win, Rick Santorum! Win, Lynn Swann! Win, Curt Weldon! GO, FIGHT, WIN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson