Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World sees Dems' win as a Bush rejection
AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/8/06 | Joseph Coleman - ap

Posted on 11/08/2006 2:09:50 AM PST by NormsRevenge

TOKYO - Democratic gains in Congress were seen around the world Wednesday as a rejection of the U.S. war in Iraq that led some observers to expect a reassessment of the American course there.

The shift in power also was seen as a signal in some capitals that the United States would put a greater emphasis on trade policy and human rights.

Many watching the election said the results were a significant blow to President Bush's presidency.

"Although his term will not end within the next year, I think Bush is already turning into a lame duck," Yuzo Yamamoto, 60, the manager of a Tokyo business consulting firm, said as Democrats won control of the House and challenged Republican dominance in the Senate in midterm elections Tuesday.

Outside observers saw the bloodshed in Iraq as the major driving force behind the Democrats' success.

"Voters have punished the Republicans. They are not happy with the way the leadership has handled the Iraq war," said Chandra Muzaffar, president of the Malaysia-based think-tank International Movement for a Just World.

Bush's foreign critics cheered in Vietnam, and in Muslim-dominated countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia.

"The Republicans lost in the election because the American voters are now fed up and bored with the war," said Vitaya Wisetrat, a prominent, anti-American Muslim cleric in Thailand. "The American people now realize that Bush is the big liar."

Echoing the sentiment of many in Muslim countries, Indonesian lawmaker Ahmad Sumargono hoped that the results would prompt a reassessment of American policies in Iraq and elsewhere.

"I am optimistic that American people have now realized the mistakes made by Bush in foreign policy. We hope this leads to significant changes, especially toward the Middle East," he said.

Abdul Hamid Mubarez, an Afghan analyst and former deputy Afghan information and culture minister, said he hoped that Democratic victories would lead to more reconstruction money for his war-torn nation.

The prospect of a sudden change in American foreign policy could be troubling to U.S. allies in Asia — such as Japan and Australia — that have thrown their vocal support behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Some, however, doubted that there would be a major shift in Iraq, said Michael McKinley, a political science professor at the Australian National University.

"There would have been some concern in policy making circles here if the Democrats had said, 'We are definitely going to withdraw by Christmas,'" McKinley said. "But they're not able to say that," he said.

"They will have concluded that it is unlikely to have radical significance in the area of U.S. foreign and strategic policy," he added.

U.S. policy on North Korea, which angered the world by testing a nuclear device on Oct. 9, is also high on the agenda in the region. Despite the test, Pyongyang has pledged to return to stalled six-nation talks on its weapons program.

While some in South Korea have speculated that a Democratic victory could erode Bush's hardline approach toward Pyongyang, others were skeptical.

Kim Tae-woo, a North Korea expert at the Seoul-based Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said Bush was unlikely to make radical changes in his policy in his final two years in office, particularly since the North was not a major campaign issue.

"Why should he change his policy line?" Kim asked, referring to Bush. "The Bush administration will feel no need for changes in the six-party talks."

Many around the world hoping for other changes in American policy said they hoped the election would be a catalyst.

In China, however, the resurgence of the Democrats raised fears of renewed U.S. concern over human rights and trade and labor issues. China's surging economy has a massive trade surplus with the United States.

"The Democratic Party ... will protect the interests of small and medium American enterprises and labor and that could produce an impact on China-U.S. trade relations," Zhang Guoqing of the state-run Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said in a report on Sina.com, one of China's most popular Internet portals.

In Japan, the government said the results would not change Tokyo's warm ties with Washington.

But the shift in favor of the Democrats was expected to complicate Japan's diplomatic approach to the U.S. For years, the Japanese have been able to successfully woo Bush's White House, knowing that the Republican Congress would largely follow its lead.

Now that calculus would have to change, said Tsuneo Watanabe, senior fellow at Mitsui Global Strategic Studies Institute in Tokyo.

"Now it's time for the Japanese, the embassy in Washington, to spend more time on Congress," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; rejection; world
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: NormsRevenge

One look at the world markets and you'll see what they really thought about the election...


61 posted on 11/08/2006 4:05:22 AM PST by GOPJ (The MSM is so busy kissing democrat butt they can't see - come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newconhere
How do you explain all of the hard line house immigration members losing?

Tancredo didn't lose.

62 posted on 11/08/2006 4:12:37 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: veronica

good post.


63 posted on 11/08/2006 4:18:08 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
Bush is screwed beyond comprehension.

Reminds me of the only "keeper" line I ever heard on Roseanne:

[Dan] We're screwed.

[Roseanne] We're beyond screwed. We're so far beyond "screwed", that the light from "screwed" will take a million years to reach us!

I laughed for days. Good one.

64 posted on 11/08/2006 4:18:46 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: floridareader1
Maybe GWB will finally figure out what a Presidential veto is.

Don't hold your breath.

65 posted on 11/08/2006 4:19:40 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
I hope they do impeach him. Put Pelosi in as commander-in-chief! Now that's a riot.

Now, don't lose your frost, Dr. Freeze. The House isn't about to pass impeachment articles against Bush.

1. Too many conservative Democrats in the new class in the House.

2. The 'Rats wouldn't get anything else done for two years -- remember what happened when Clinton was impeached. Everything else came to a stop.

3. Voter backlash. The GOP lost seats in the middle of the biggest Democratic Party scandal since the beginnings of the Republic. Partly it was Clinton and Kweisi Mfume trying to cook up some bloc-voting devilment below the radar (Clinton always liked that "below-the-radar"/"October-surprise" stuff -- like Congressman Foley, e.g., which has Clinton-stink all over it). But partly it was public dubiousness about the momentousness of what the GOP in the House were doing.

4. Pelosi in the White House (assuming Bush had to resign, e.g., and Cheney wouldn't take the oath for health reasons) would screw up the coronation of Hillary and the elevation of Slick to Secretary General of the U.N. Slick and Hillary and their ranting choir of fallen seraphim wouldn't like that. So it isn't going to happen.

66 posted on 11/08/2006 4:29:25 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think the rest of the World gets it. Adios, Iraq.


67 posted on 11/08/2006 4:55:50 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

AL-QAEDA was the big winner last night.


68 posted on 11/08/2006 5:24:28 AM PST by nycroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool

Don't forget the body armor. Make it level 3.


69 posted on 11/08/2006 5:29:00 AM PST by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Great post veronica.

PLUS - the Democrats, many of them, ran as Conservatives.

How true that statement is, but I wonder how they will be able to govern as a Conservative. My bet is that they will turn hard left, now that they were elected.

Any Republican who did not vote has hand in this too.

No kidding. I blame every Republican who sat out or decided to "punish" our elected Congress. The "protest" voters were idiots.

70 posted on 11/08/2006 5:44:00 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The terrorists have many allies in the United States, especially in the democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fireman43
America voted for appeasement, for surrender to Islamofascism, for rule by the leftist media, for Sharia Law, for al-Qaeda/Iranian nukes over our cities...

Yep. You have absolutely nailed it 100%.

71 posted on 11/08/2006 5:50:59 AM PST by martin gibson ("I care not what course others may take, but as for myself, give me Ralph Stanley or give me death")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You said it for me. I noticed that a lot of the exit polls the corruption was a bigger issue than the War in Iraq.

It will be very interesting to see how this plays out. The Democrats are not exactly in the cat bird's seat here. I have absolute confidence they are going to make a complete muck of it.


72 posted on 11/08/2006 6:16:28 AM PST by Roses0508 (Democracy does not guarantee equality of conditions - it only guarantees equality of opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nycroads

AL-QAEDA was the big winner last night.


The Al-QaeDems ya mean. ;-)


73 posted on 11/08/2006 12:45:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Aloha!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Very nice pic, Thanks! and so apropos.


74 posted on 11/08/2006 12:46:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Aloha!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The furriners appear to not know that in off-year elections the out party tends to pick up seats in Congress. Sometimes more, sometimes less. This time is not much different.


75 posted on 11/08/2006 12:47:10 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

God help us is all I can seem to say. Such freaking lies in the media as usual.


76 posted on 11/08/2006 12:48:40 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

It's always darkest before dawn, yaknow.

See ya at the polls in '08. :-)


77 posted on 11/08/2006 12:50:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Aloha!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The shift in power also was seen as a signal in some capitals that the United States would put a greater emphasis on trade policy and human rights

LOL! Just because libs talk about this stuff at cocktail parties it doesn't mean they'll actually do anything. For Dems, getting elected is the final goal, not doing anything after elected. Their job is done now, the rest is up to fate.

78 posted on 11/08/2006 12:53:22 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

I can't imagine how much the state department thinks it has a free license to botch things up.


79 posted on 11/08/2006 2:41:42 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

"How do you explain all of the hard line house immigration members losing?"

Changing Demographics....

Democrats will now dump Blacks upon the trash heap of Genocide by Abortion, as they race to secure thier future slave voting group...


80 posted on 11/08/2006 2:45:23 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson