VoteYesForLife put in $2.1 million (incl. the $300 I gave), WITHOUT the President's support, WITHOUT the support of the National Right to Life Committee.
The bill would have made it to the Supreme Court, satisfied the condition laid out in Roe vs. Wade Section IX Paragraph A, and ultimately overturned the most ghastly court ruling in human history:
A. The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment. The appellant conceded as much on reargument. 51 On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument 52 that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
That some, like you, to justify past actions must live in a fantasy world in which the baby magically "poofs" into personhood at some arbitrary point in its well-underway development is not good cause to continue the most brutal act imaginable upon the largest single victim group in human history (yes, we have overcome Hitler's deathcount, Stalin's deathcount, and Mao's).
The defeat of a referrendum backed by a $2.1M group by a $8M group does not indicate we are a pro-abortion nation. It indicates we are a blissfully ignorant nation that can be bought.
Ultimately, it's people who fill in the ballot. I respect your beliefs. What I'm saying is that the majority of people in this country don't agree with them.