Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tim Long
Yes, but they had to welcome some quasi-pro lifers (and one mock one) into their party to pull it off. This establishes a precedent for more and even stronger more genuine prolifers to crack their roach motel ranks and shine some brilliant light on the fester of the abortion lobby, causing it to eventually crumble from within.

I would expect in 08 even more will be allowed to run with them, and when they pay their political dues, they will start breaking with them on social issues. A flood eventually.

14 posted on 11/08/2006 4:43:55 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rjp2005
I don't believe it....the Dem leadership does not allow its candidates to be pro-life. These guys will soon be in lock step with NARAL and NOW.
17 posted on 11/08/2006 4:52:03 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: rjp2005
Notice that they all call Harry Reid pro-life, but he votes pro-life about 50% of the time. I DON'T call that pro-life. I call that straddling the fence.
18 posted on 11/08/2006 4:53:46 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson