[MACVSOG68]

Your post abandons rational thought, given the mountain of evidence contrary to your positions. As such, I am not inclined to waste time with a reponse to each point. However, read and learn.

So in other words you can't point to the provisions in the bill itself?

The only positions I put forth were that most Americans favored a comprehensive package which included some version of the Senate bill. I gave you proof of that and offered more. I also stated that the fence, security, and enforcement would be a large part of the price tag. Finally, I took the position that I doubt you will be thrilled with what the Dems come up with. Which of those abandons rational thought?

Now that you've insulted me, at least enlighten me.

[snowrip]

My apologies for having insulted you.

My point is that there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary of all your positions, but that I did not have the time nor the inclination to regurgitate fifty pages of documents and testimony... which is why I included a few links.