To: Enosh
"Recess nomination again."
...not sure W can do that....anyone??
12 posted on
11/09/2006 2:17:06 PM PST by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: scottdeus12
Hmm... Good question. I don't think there's a limit, but I could very well be wrong.
29 posted on
11/09/2006 2:26:27 PM PST by
Enosh
To: scottdeus12
Recess appoint Alan Keyes, he knows his way around the UN, been there done that.
31 posted on
11/09/2006 2:28:20 PM PST by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: scottdeus12
If he does a recess appointment, Bolton would have to agree to serve as a volunteer with no pay.
Really. I'm not kidding.
33 posted on
11/09/2006 2:29:23 PM PST by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
To: scottdeus12
If recessed appointed again, I believe it is at no pay.
Also, when the Dims controlled before they would not recess. They would leave enough members to run things with proxies to keep recess appointments from being able to be done.
40 posted on
11/09/2006 2:36:58 PM PST by
Ingtar
(Prensa dos para el ingles)
To: scottdeus12
Sure he can use recess over and over till end of his term on Bolton or DummyRATs finally give him his vote. RATs are no longer advising and consenting on Bolton, only obstructing his nomination vote. Bush is perfectly free to sidestep Dems as long as they desire to sidestep their duty to advise and consent.
42 posted on
11/09/2006 2:39:01 PM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: scottdeus12
""Recess nomination again."
...not sure W can do that....anyone??"
He can. But I don't believe he can for Bolton.
I would make the Ambassador to the UN Rummy.
48 posted on
11/09/2006 2:48:17 PM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(The voting machines aren't broken. The Dems operating the voting machines are broken.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson