Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman: Call Me a Democrat (Barf Alert)
Newsmax ^ | 11-11-06 | Newsmax Staff

Posted on 11/10/2006 10:41:25 AM PST by truthandlife

Sen. Joe Lieberman, who won re-election as an independent, has a message for his Senate colleagues in the next Congress: Call me a Democrat.

The three-term Connecticut lawmaker defied party leaders when he launched his independent bid after losing to Democrat Ned Lamont in the August primary. During the campaign, he vowed to be an "independent-minded Democrat" if he were re-elected. In Tuesday's election, Lieberman won strong GOP support and given the closely divided Senate, Republicans are expected to court him.

So will he count as a Democrat or an independent who caucuses with the majority Democrats? In an e-mail message late Thursday, Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein said the senator will begin his new term as a Democrat.

With the Democratic takeover of the Senate, Lieberman is in line to become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

In a post-election news conference, Lieberman said he was reassured by Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid that he would retain his seniority when the new Senate convenes.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: cant; captainobvious; democrats; duh; heisarat; lieberman; notsurprised; trust; whatdidyouexpect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. If the President thinks he can get along with the Dems in D.C. he does not understand how the Dems operate. I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way and never did it by trying to get along with them.
1 posted on 11/10/2006 10:41:27 AM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Joe said all along that he would caucus with the Democrats. That's probably a reason he won. If he did anything else, he would be untrustworthy.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 10:42:46 AM PST by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Why is anyone surprised?

I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.

3 posted on 11/10/2006 10:44:20 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.

I didn't either. People were acting as if he were another Zell Miller.

4 posted on 11/10/2006 10:47:14 AM PST by TUAN_JIM (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'
5 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:06 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

As if we would have confused him with a Republican.


6 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:37 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

No real surprise there.


7 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:40 AM PST by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.

How does it show that?

8 posted on 11/10/2006 10:50:09 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.

I may not agree with Sen. Lieberman but you cannot say he is untrustworthy. He has always said if he was elected as an independent he would caucus with the Democratic party. He has never said he would not do this.

In a sense, Lieberman is now the most powerful Senator. He owes absolutely nothing to the Democratic Party now. He can demand any chairmanship with either party if he wanted to. Without his caucus vote, the Democrats would not have a majority and would be forced to share power with Republicans.

9 posted on 11/10/2006 10:50:20 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

he is a strong supporter of the war on terrorism. we should be fortunate we can get even that out of connecticut.


10 posted on 11/10/2006 10:50:51 AM PST by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Good point!

Lieberman will never learn. I felt badly how he was treated; now I don't.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 10:51:49 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24
he is a strong supporter of the war on terrorism. we should be fortunate we can get even that out of connecticut.

We'll see.

I don't trust any liberal or any Democrat.

12 posted on 11/10/2006 10:52:50 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.

Why?! What's so hard to understand that Lieberman is 5X better than his opponent, Demented?

13 posted on 11/10/2006 10:53:55 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

The wife in denial who stays with the abusive husband no matter what.


14 posted on 11/10/2006 10:54:09 AM PST by Argus (Silver Lining in the Democrat Takeover Top Ten List #6: The gay weddings will be fabulous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. - not true; campaigns are one thing, working with the other side is quite another; politics is NOT nice business, the President knows this.


15 posted on 11/10/2006 10:55:50 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; #1CTYankee
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'

If we didn't, the Senate would have included George Soros' / moveon.org's pet anti-war, anti-Bush moonbat Ned Lamont, who roared into Connecticut like a hurricane. Lieberman was clearly the lesser of the two evils. He's a liberal for sure, but definitely "gets it" regarding the WOT. The Connecticut GOP candidate was not even remotely viable. Our choice was between Lieberman and Lamont.

I never thought for one day Joe would become a Republican after he won the election, btw. I knew he would remain a democRAT.

16 posted on 11/10/2006 10:56:04 AM PST by nutmeg (In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
An idea of how sick this debacle makes me.

Regards, Ivan

17 posted on 11/10/2006 10:56:57 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; All
In early January, when this hoopla about Lamont will have died down and party activists are thinking about other things, Joe Lieberman will contribute a very large sum of money to a Democratic campaign organization to make amends for his failure to help Democrat House candidates.

Say a little bird told me.

After that, as far as anything official goes, Lieberman will be a full member of the Democrat establishment. Joe Lieberman is as much a Democrat as Pat Leahy. What's unbelievably ironic about all this is that the money that Lieberman turns over is almost exclusively from the $6-$8 million in GOP contributors that Rove steered towards him. So you'll effectively have Bush Pioneer types funding the Democrat party. BRILLIANT STRATEGY GUYS -- so glad that money went to a stalwart conservative like Loserman rather than to, I DON'T KNOW ---- George Allen.

18 posted on 11/10/2006 10:56:58 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Anybody who expeced Joe to be a republican was just fooling themselves.

Joe has sense and can be trusted more than any other dem on the WoT, but other issues he has always promised to be the liberal that he is.


19 posted on 11/10/2006 10:57:13 AM PST by FreedomNeocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
What's so hard to understand that Lieberman is 5X better than his opponent, Demented?

Thank you... you are correct. Joe is probably at least 10X better than Red Ned Lamont, who was supported by George Soros, Moveon.org, Code Pink, Daily Kos, DU, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Cindy Sheehan...

20 posted on 11/10/2006 10:59:39 AM PST by nutmeg (In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson