No it isn't. If it was you would have cut and pasted it by now. You lie.
This is a joke, right? Please tell me you're kidding. You can't possibly be this dense.
I gave you the link in my reply #88. In reply #89, you thanked me for that link and also said, "It wasn't in the article posted here or in the WND article." But the link *is* in the WND article. That's where I got it from. Repeat: The link to DuBord's article is in the WND article; that's where I got the link; that's the link I gave you in reply 88; and that's the link you thanked me for in reply 89.
But still for some godforsaken reason, after I said, "Actually it [the link] is in the WND article," you come back and say, "No it isn't. If it was you would have cut and pasted it by now. You lie."
Hello? Is this thing on?