Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ahmadinejad hopes for celebration of Iran's full nuclear success ((THIS YEAR))
IRNA ^ | Tuesday November 14, 2006

Posted on 11/14/2006 5:06:55 AM PST by Biscuit85

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday hoped that Iran's full success in the field of fuel cycle would be celebrated this year.

President Ahmadinejad said here Tuesday that the so-called time of diplomacy is running fully in the Iranian nation's favor.

Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, President Ahmadinejad said the 5+1 group has eventually agreed to deal peacefully and cooperate with nuclear Iran.

"Today, they have finally agreed to live and deal with nuclear Iran, which has mastered nuclear fuel cycle," said Ahmadinejad.

He said today, Iran is a country possessing nuclear fuel cycle.

He added that by the grace of God Almighty and thanks to the vigilance and perseverance of the Iranian nation, "our condition has been stabilized."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abomb; ahmadinejad; eu; iran; mideast; nuclear; nukes; un; us; wmd
Are they going nuclear this year?
1 posted on 11/14/2006 5:06:58 AM PST by Biscuit85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85
So the point of no return will occur within 6 weeks or has it already occurred ?
2 posted on 11/14/2006 5:12:51 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85
Okay... serious question. If they are developing nuclear weapons, what do they have to gain strategically by always announcing every step of progress? Most countries keep this quiet.
3 posted on 11/14/2006 5:14:03 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85

Well, the vote this year WAS for change...


4 posted on 11/14/2006 5:14:46 AM PST by jim35 ("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85
In the present climate if the Iranians go nuclear with a functioning bomb, we either have to bug out or do a preemptive strike. Looks like that is what is being hotly debated back in DC. Explains why GWB is bouncing back and forth like a ball on a ping pong table (Realist-Neocon Tugowar).
5 posted on 11/14/2006 5:15:11 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85
Are they going nuclear this year?

I suspect they already are.

6 posted on 11/14/2006 5:18:43 AM PST by TADSLOS (Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Why did Iran just make that video of the US aircraft carrier public ? Why did they show us all their new found 'secret' weapons during their recent military exercises ? Why did China just pop up a sub in the middle of a US Carrier Battle Group ? Obviously the Iranians have not read The Art of War - 'All warfare is based on deception'. The Chinese however have absolutely no excuse.


7 posted on 11/14/2006 5:18:52 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Any recent strange earthquakes in Iran ?
8 posted on 11/14/2006 5:21:07 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85

Just exactly what does this mean.? At making them or using them?


9 posted on 11/14/2006 5:22:52 AM PST by dforest (Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Explains why GWB is bouncing back and forth like a ball on a ping pong table (Realist-Neocon Tugowar).

The waffling is hurting our foreign policy worse than the damn Democrats. It's time to crap or get the hell off the pot - how can anyone seriously belive that a military presence in non-nuclear Iraq and "diplomatic pressure" against its nuclear neighbor is a viable foreign policy. Why does Bush keep talking about "talks" with Iran? What the hell is there to talk about? Our only consolation for this spineless foreign policy is that while Bush won't enforce the Bush doctrine, the Israelis will. I would rather rely on our military for my protection rather than Israel, but I guess beggars can't be choosers...
10 posted on 11/14/2006 5:23:12 AM PST by jonesboheim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Fear


11 posted on 11/14/2006 5:23:41 AM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SQUID

It's obviously a calculated step. If Ahmadinejad thought that an American military response was a possibility, he wouldn't announce it. He certainly doesn't have to worry about intel revealing it because after Iraq it's a hard sell to Americans. He's either looking for concessions or is trying to garner support among his Middle Eastern counterparts by standing up to "big bad America"


12 posted on 11/14/2006 5:27:56 AM PST by jonesboheim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SQUID

So we have someone playing 'Fear Factor' with nuclear weapon development. Now that show would probably get high ratings. Oh wait. It already is.


13 posted on 11/14/2006 5:29:25 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85
Again, another great result of a half-azz foreign policy.

With our current government Cuba will have ICBM nuke capability soon. Our democratic congress with provide the technology so there can be balance and fairness in the world.

SQ
14 posted on 11/14/2006 5:30:27 AM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonesboheim

As Golda Meier has been quoted as saying, 'We can forgive them for killing our children, but we can never forgive them for making us kill there's'. Tough decision to make for some. We need a knight leading us and all we have our compassionate conservatives. As Rumsfeld said - 'You fight a war with what you have, not what you need'. Paraphrased quotes.


15 posted on 11/14/2006 5:37:58 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

ON THE NET...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1730468/posts?page=687#687


16 posted on 11/14/2006 1:26:44 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biscuit85

They seem to be less than careful about radwaste. This could be a problem for them.


17 posted on 11/14/2006 1:29:00 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson