I must've missed the place where someone, anyone, was suggesting he be put to death.
A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, and, based on your post #6, your knowledge of Christianity and the Bible appear to fall in that category.
"I must've missed the place where someone, anyone, was suggesting he be put to death."
Nice try, putting into that kind of context.
In effect, he is being stoned to death because the purpose of this article. and most of the rest I've seen in the last two days, is to stifle debate, and to cause dissention in the ranks.
I know in my heart of hearts that barring some earth-shattering event that causes a complete re-evaluation of the political landscape, theman is doomed to fail at the primary level. But that doesn't mean he doesn't have anything to add to the debate, and that is exactly what is being done here: by concentrating on the negative, we're discounting the possibility that there's a positive in there somewhere.
If that's how you choose to practice your politics, then I hope you are happy with whatever lock-step-ideological, pure-as-the-driven-snow (wink, wink), no-idea-that-didn't-originate-in-Scripture, milquetoast eventually garners the nomination.