[Wombat101]

"In some cases, I think we just have to accept that some candidates are unacceptable to a lot of folks on the right."

True. But does this mean they shouldn't get a fair hearing and be subject to gratuitous trashing? This is supposed to be America, and there's supposed to be the free exchange of ideas. We creep closer to theocracy every day in this country, despite what Bill O'Reilly says.

"You may not like to hear it, but Rudy is going to cause more division and anger within our party..."

I see, so unity is good, but only if it's under a regime of strict moral and political ideology, arbitrarily applied by the self-righteous, self-appointed hall monitors of the religious right? Hmmm. that sounds an awful lot like totalitarianism to me.

[TitansAFC]

You really need to wash out your eyes.

Rudy is wrong on several, several issues - unacceptably wrong.

That has nothing to do with purity or theocracy. Those are facts - he has an open record.

I seek purity and theocracy no more in my opposition to Rudy because of important issues that you do in your opposition of Hitlery on important issues.

Just because I find Rudy unacceptable does not make me a theocrat. Despite your inability to think otherwise of Rudy opposers.

[Maelstrom]

I see...so unity is good unless it's a conservativce candidate.