[Liz]

Given that Rudy has stated publically that he agrees with Clinton on most issues, there's really no point in further discussion of him as a viable Presidential candidate.

And how about "Warrior Rudy" DEFENDING the Clintons?

When Bill Clinton had that televised contretemps with Chris Wallace recently, Clinton told Wallace it was "neocons" stopping him in his attempt to fight terrorism.

Oops. Shouldn't have said that. Blaming neocons is a Big no-no.

Then low and behold, 9/11 WOT Warrior Rudy, emerges unasked, and tells the world that the Clintons were NOT to blame for the spread of terrorism (Who told you to say that Rudy? Billy Kristol?)

Doesn't Rudy know the Clintons spent the past 6 years doing every thing possible (using Bush-hater Soros' dollars) to encourage the insurgents to rout US troops?

Rudy rushing to defending Clintonism takes care of the desperate cries from Rudy rooters who insist conservatives must sacrifice everything, and nominate Giuliani-----in order to to keep Hillary out of the White House.

Bubba, Hillary, and Rudy are cut from the same cloth. They believe they have the magical ability to "cloud men's minds" so that everything they ever said or did---anything that gets in the way of their ambitions---- is magically erased.

[TommyDale]

Here's a question that I have yet to find an answer for: I keep reading that Rudy has been great on the War on Terror. Who says so? He was Mayor of New York City, not with Homeland Security or a Commander-In-Chief. How do we really know how he would prosecute a war against Islamo-facists? Just because he claims credit for reducing crime in NYC (even though ALL CRIME rates dropped)?