Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birth Certificate to Say Baby Has 2 Moms
BREITBART.COM ^

Posted on 11/15/2006 2:28:48 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Birth Certificate to Say Baby Has 2 Moms Nov 15 4:50 PM US/Eastern

By GEOFF MULVIHILL Associated Press Writer

MOUNT LAUREL, N.J.

Two women will be listed as parents on the birth certificate of a baby born this week in New Jersey, one of the first implications of a state Supreme Court ruling that gives same-sex couples access to the same rights as married couples.

The state and the women agreed in a closed family court proceeding Monday, the day before the child was born, that both women should be listed in light of the landmark high court ruling. A judge agreed with the state and the women, lawyers said.

In New Jersey, birth certificates are typically mailed to parents.

Assistant Attorney General Patrick DeAlmeida said the women are the first he knows of to take advantage of new rights granted by the Oct. 25 ruling.

The Burlington County women, who are registered as domestic partners, did not want their names made public, their attorney Stephen Hyland said.

Under state law, the husband of a woman who gives birth through artificial insemination is listed on the birth certificate as the father. No such provision is made for lesbian couples, who often go through lengthy and costly adoptions to give both women equal rights as parents.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: antinaturallaw; degeneratedonkeycrat; dementalillness; homophiles; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; perversion; repeallawsofnature
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last
jeez.........
1 posted on 11/15/2006 2:28:49 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Sub-Driver

When plain biological facts conflict with political correctness, the liberals will uphold pc every time.

So much for their devotion to "science". Their political superstition is more ironclad than the most extreme religious fundamentalist's.


3 posted on 11/15/2006 2:32:58 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Our country is sooooooo over.


4 posted on 11/15/2006 2:33:27 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wrong... wrong... wrong.

There are LEGAL reasons the father should be listed. (what if the kid stands to inherit something nobody knows about yet?)

There are MEDICAL reasons that they might want to trace his genetic background.

The only reasons to have two womens names on the birth certificate are political correctness, selfishness, and feel goodisms.
None of which have anything to do with the welfare of the child.


5 posted on 11/15/2006 2:33:30 PM PST by djf (Islam!! There's a flag on the moon! Guess whose? Hint: Not yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

this is what it looks like when you try to hard


6 posted on 11/15/2006 2:33:37 PM PST by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

I see your point, but there is no need for the derogatory terms.


7 posted on 11/15/2006 2:33:40 PM PST by HHKrepublican_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Of what benefit is this politicized birth certificate to the child?


8 posted on 11/15/2006 2:34:07 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Of what benefit is this politicized birth certificate to the child?



Legal benefit regarding health insurance, etc,


9 posted on 11/15/2006 2:35:13 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Oh, good grief, it is not.


10 posted on 11/15/2006 2:36:18 PM PST by Mazda3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Our country is sooooooo over.

Our country is not so weak that a simple shift in social mores can destroy it.

At the end of the day, I couldn't care less who marries who.

11 posted on 11/15/2006 2:36:18 PM PST by Wormwood (Partition Iraq NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2
"but there is no need for the derogatory terms."

Which "derogatory terms" were you citing?

12 posted on 11/15/2006 2:36:24 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Sub-Driver

That'll certainly be helpful when the child later needs to provide a doctor with a family medical history.


14 posted on 11/15/2006 2:37:48 PM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Our country is sooooooo over.






Did you honestly expect to live your whole life in a country that was exactly the same as the one you were born into?


15 posted on 11/15/2006 2:37:55 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Did you honestly expect to live your whole life in a country that was exactly the same as the one you were born into?

LOL! Great point.

16 posted on 11/15/2006 2:38:45 PM PST by Wormwood (Partition Iraq NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I feel sorry for the child.


17 posted on 11/15/2006 2:39:16 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Just one day without polls would be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

Just stay away from New Jersey with your common sense.


18 posted on 11/15/2006 2:39:44 PM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is the baby's name "Heather" by any chance?


19 posted on 11/15/2006 2:41:08 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

< chalks one up in the Xenalyte column >


20 posted on 11/15/2006 2:41:28 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson