Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fkabuckeyesrule

Rudy v Hil would give America the choice of two pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control candidates.

...to the delight of liberals everywhere.
7 posted on 11/15/2006 9:09:16 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Old_Mil
And if Rudy wanted to do the country and the Republican Party a big favor--
he should have run against Hillary for the Senate!!

He could have done the country (and the state of NY) a great deal of good in that role, while remaining true to his 'obvious liberal leanings' as a New York senator.

I don't think that anyone (even here) would have opposed Rudy 'dethroning' Hillary. I would have thought that NY would have been perfect for him, easy pickings--after all, they know him best and his liberal positions would have been very in-tune with NY!!!

He could have defeated her,,,and THEN ran for President. He might even have gotten a few more conservatives to support his run if he had taken care of Hillary first.

But then again, his liberal leanings are not too far away from those of Hillary anyway. So I suspect he figured the 'status quo' was just fine in NY--no need to make a change there at all.

He'll never get my vote.

39 posted on 11/15/2006 11:45:31 PM PST by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson