Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

 

When it comes to helping the needy, Brooks writes: "For too long, liberals have been claiming they are the most virtuous members of American society. Although they usually give less to charity, they have nevertheless lambasted conservatives for their callousness in the face of social injustice."

w00t!!
(We Own the Other Team)

 

I've preordered this book!  I can't wait to throw some well annotated facts in the face of some people I know.

Hope he goes on the Rush/Shawn/Laura interview circuit.

 

1 posted on 11/16/2006 11:17:31 AM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: holdonnow

A humble bump for your consideration...


2 posted on 11/16/2006 11:18:18 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

This is one to buy two copies of - one for myself and one for a liberal.


3 posted on 11/16/2006 11:22:50 AM PST by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
Don't tell the Clintons this. After all they generously gave their used underwear to charity.
4 posted on 11/16/2006 11:24:58 AM PST by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

He must have been comparing them to Al Gore!


6 posted on 11/16/2006 11:28:42 AM PST by .cnI redruM (2008 is another day and another battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
The book's basic findings are that conservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure.

This should make him terribly popular in the mrdia!

7 posted on 11/16/2006 11:29:38 AM PST by Onelifetogive (* I'm not an economist, but I play one on the Internet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

Good post! Love the part about the "sacrifice" he will make to be interviewed by O'Reilly to further the cause.

I was fortunate to be raised in a household in which donating to worthy causes was emphasized, and most of my family are *gasp* conservatives.


8 posted on 11/16/2006 11:29:46 AM PST by Theresawithanh (Every time I hear the word "exercise", I wash my mouth out with chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

bump


9 posted on 11/16/2006 11:31:17 AM PST by Jibaholic (Whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
"For too long, liberals have been claiming they are the most virtuous members of American society. Although they usually give less to charity, they have nevertheless lambasted conservatives for their callousness in the face of social injustice."

I recall that when Al Gore was running back in 2000, his tax return showed that with an income well up in the 7 figures, he and Tipper only managed to spend $300 on charity. Hell, Hillary gave more than that in used underwere alone. :~))

10 posted on 11/16/2006 11:32:00 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

Liberals and Conservatives are just about equally generous to those in need. The difference is that Conservatives are generous with THEIR OWN money, while Liberals are always very generous with OTHER PEOPLE'S money.


13 posted on 11/16/2006 11:32:58 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
The stereotype is that Liberals are more caring and generous because they want to "help the poor". But they don't really. They want to pass the responsibility of the poor from their own shoulders to the government's. That way, when people continue to live in poverty, they can sit back and say its not their fault, its the government's. So not only do they have to do nothing for the poor, they also get to feel smugly self-righteous because they ascribe to the "compassionate" philosophy of liberalism.

Conservatives are quite the opposite. We think it is a personal responsibility to help the poor, which is why we give more.

14 posted on 11/16/2006 11:34:14 AM PST by The Blitherer (In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
#Religious people are more charitable -- including with secular donations -- than secularists.

# People who drink alcohol moderately are more charitable than those who don't drink.

Does this mean the only good secularist is a drunk secularist?

15 posted on 11/16/2006 11:34:14 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

"People who drink alcohol moderately are more charitable than those who don't drink."

I particularly like this finding!


17 posted on 11/16/2006 11:35:03 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

So talk is cheap. Who would have thunk it?


18 posted on 11/16/2006 11:36:33 AM PST by freespirited (The MSM is the root of all evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
Watch for the hard left to trot out Gates and Buffett for giving some $50 billion combined. But they will forget to remind us that both men succeeded in such generosity by avoiding the taxes that would be due upon their deaths - a tax they both advocate but apparently sought to avoid. I guess they thought they could better direct their money than turning it over to the government.

Go figure.
19 posted on 11/16/2006 11:36:49 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

Wow...this from the Syracuse Sub-Standard.


22 posted on 11/16/2006 11:38:06 AM PST by Ouderkirk (America won't win another war until the 1960s flower children are pushing up petunias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

I disagree. Liberals are much more generous. They just don't use their own money.


26 posted on 11/16/2006 11:41:22 AM PST by Niteranger68 (Big winners of election 2006: Democrats, terrorists, MSM, Hollywood, anti-war protestors, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

bookmark for later printing.


31 posted on 11/16/2006 11:48:48 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible
I don't like threads like this. We are not supposed to brag or be full of ourselves for giving money to charity especially laughing at those who don't (please explain what is conservative or Christian about that). I don't know why they have to write a book on the subject. This is a horrible post. I believe arrogance is not a very good thing. We should just give more money to charity including myself. This is weird. My parents always said that you should do things because you want to not to receive praise. I believe we should think about that for a while.
32 posted on 11/16/2006 11:49:56 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

Liberals prefer to be generous with other people's tax dollars.


33 posted on 11/16/2006 11:50:49 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Incorrigible

Liberals are also very quick to call on somebody else to make sacrifices. But they never sacrifice anything themselves.


34 posted on 11/16/2006 11:52:17 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson