Skip to comments.
Sikhs blame British policy of 'Asian' tag
Times of India ^
| 11/17/06
| Times news network
Posted on 11/17/2006 9:34:08 AM PST by voletti
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: sageb1
"The article made it sound like a powder keg situation between Christians and Muslims, but I haven't heard anything about a backlash out of Christians. Or is this considered more a youth gang issue?"
Probably elements of religion, of race (Black Carribean/Pakistani) and just usual youth gangs, all mixed up together.
21
posted on
11/17/2006 1:42:57 PM PST
by
Canard
To: Canard
22
posted on
11/17/2006 1:48:44 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: KarinG1
They left his head? Dern whiner. It could have been much worse. ?!?
Kriss Donald was killed, and this was in retaliation. Only problem is that it was "friendly fire"...of all the groups to attack, it's sad that they attacked a Sikh boy.
Idiocy similar to the killing of Balbir Singh Sodhi in Mesa, Arizona, on 9/15 (2001).
23
posted on
11/17/2006 2:13:24 PM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
I don't think we should be giving these thugs the justification of 'retaliation'.
They had no connection with Kris Donald, were in a completely different city and took it upon themselves to pick out a random passerby to attack.
24
posted on
11/17/2006 2:31:38 PM PST
by
Canard
To: Canard
"the mob graffitting the house of a paediatrician (they didn't realise that wasn't the same as paedophile..)"
LOL, talk about messing something up.
To: Canard
I don't think we should be giving these thugs the justification of 'retaliation'. I see your point...though I admit being unable to come up with a way to properly word it and get across what I meant.
Bottom line...they're thugs.
26
posted on
11/17/2006 7:05:35 PM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
Clockwork Orange
27
posted on
11/18/2006 5:32:36 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: MadIvan
"Asian" seems to be a tag left over from British Colonial days. Almost as bad, IMO, as calling a person the "n" word here in the States.
Seems our countries are quick to defend Muslims, from ANY nation, and the other nationalities get a pass.
28
posted on
11/18/2006 8:30:29 AM PST
by
madison10
(If my people, who are called by My name will humble themselves and pray...I will heal their land.)
To: madison10
""Asian" seems to be a tag left over from British Colonial days. Almost as bad, IMO, as calling a person the "n" word here in the States."
"Asian" is definitely not an insult - its generally accepted; there is a newspaper, "Asian Times" (probably got its own website), and at least one porn magazine "Asian Babes" (or at least there used to be).
29
posted on
11/19/2006 5:07:07 AM PST
by
Mac1
To: voletti
Unless the continent from which these people spring is called other than Asia, the label is accurate, tribal differences between individuals notwithstanding.
I have no patience for contrary opinion. Sorry.
Not really sorry, of course.
30
posted on
11/19/2006 5:21:58 AM PST
by
ExGeeEye
(Day 185 (counting up))
To: ExGeeEye
"I have no patience for contrary opinion. Sorry."
Each to his own, dude.
"Not really sorry, of course."
Of course.
31
posted on
11/19/2006 8:10:46 AM PST
by
voletti
(Awareness and Equanimity.)
To: Cronos; voletti; MadIvan
Its no doubt wrong on part of the media to tag Hindus and Sikhs along with the Muslims but its got little to do with the tag itself. Britain is one of the most racist society in the world. I have cousins who are (unfortunately) British citizens now.
I doubt the attacks on Hindus and Sikhs would cease just with the removal of the "Asian" tag. What good do you think will that do? The attacking mobs will become more "educated"? Will they know better now about who they should attack and who they should leave out? Will the Hindus and Sikhs cease to become "Asians"? Will the attackers suddenly start looking at Hindus and Sikhs as friends?
To: Gengis Khan; MadIvan
Its no doubt wrong on part of the media to tag Hindus and Sikhs along with the Muslims but its got little to do with the tag itself. Britain is one of the most racist society in the world.
you've GOT to be kidding -- I disagree completely, the UK's a lot more multi-cultural and tolerant than any other place: including India.
33
posted on
11/20/2006 9:43:49 AM PST
by
Cronos
("Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant" - Omar Ahmed, CAIR)
To: Cronos
"Multi-cultural" my ass. Tolerant?? Now you have got to be kidding. In UK multiculturalism resides inside ghettos. And they celebrate diversity with rioting. Its soo tolerant that religious leaders (living on government doles) scream death threats for infidels (read Hindus and Jews) from mosques.
And lets not even talk about Northern Ireland. British (so-called) multiculturalism isn't something thats like or wanted by most of her people. Its the result of the Empire imploding post WWII, that UK had to willy-nilly accept British subjects from the Caribbeans, East Africa and other place that freed itself from colonisation. Multi-culturalism is still resented by most in Britain. The attack on the Sikh boy is the result of that resentment in general against "foreigners". Not necessarily the anger of the British youth is directed only against the Muslims.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson