To: trisham
I can see that your prior post was genuine, so excuse my snide answer. I was being sarcastic when I asked for the heritage of the guy (weegee?) who refuses to criticize Michael Richards, but wants to do nothing but divert, and then he asks where I work so he can come heckle me. What Richards did in attacking a heckler's race was imply that a black person had better not heckle him, it was not acceptable behavior. I was turning it around on weegee. How would he like it if I attacked his heritage as part of my response to his posts, instead of attacking his logic?
Hope that clears things up.
301 posted on
11/20/2006 1:34:19 PM PST by
Defiant
(Dems don't want to lose Iraq, they just want Hillary to win it and then fly onto a carrier.)
To: Defiant
Thanks. I've been reading this thread with some interest. The responses to this article have really run the gamut.
305 posted on
11/20/2006 1:40:51 PM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Defiant
"What Richards did in attacking a heckler's race was imply that a black person had better not heckle him, it was not acceptable behavior."
You think that Richards ONLY lashed out because they were black?
That is quite a stretch.
327 posted on
11/20/2006 2:44:10 PM PST by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: All
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson