Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election 2008: 43% Would Never Vote for Mormon Candidate (Rasmussen Poll)
Yahoooo via Rasmussen ^ | 11/20/06

Posted on 11/20/2006 8:24:45 AM PST by areafiftyone

Mitt Romney (R) begins the 2008 campaign season in fourth place among those seeking the GOP Presidential nomination, trailing Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Condoleezza Rice. While many Republican insiders believe the Massachusetts Governor could become an attractive candidate to the party's social conservatives, a Rasmussen Reports survey finds that Romney's faith may initially be more of a hindrance than a help.

Forty-three percent (43%) of American voters say they would never even consider voting for a Mormon Presidential candidate. Only 38% say they would consider casting such a vote while 19% are not sure. Half (53%) of all Evangelical Christians say that they would not consider voting for a Mormon candidate.

Overall, 29% of Likely Voters have a favorable opinion of Romney while 30% hold an unfavorable view. Most of those opinions are less than firmly held. Ten percent (10%) hold a very favorable opinion while 11% have a very unfavorable assessment. Among the 41% with no opinion of Romney, just 27% say they would consider voting for a Mormon.

It is possible, of course, that these perceptions might change as Romney becomes better known and his faith is considered in the context of his campaign. Currently, just 19% of Likely Voters are able to identify Romney as the Mormon candidate from a list of six potential Presidential candidates.

The response to a theoretical Mormon candidate is far less negative than the response to a Muslim candidate or an atheist. Sixty-one percent (61%) of Likely Voters say they would never consider voting for a Muslim Presidential candidate. Sixty percent (60%) say the same about an atheist.

The Rasmussen Reports survey found that 35% say that a candidate's faith and religious beliefs are very important in their voting decision. Another 27% say faith and religious beliefs are somewhat important. Ninety-two percent (92%) of Evangelical Christian voters consider a candidate's faith and beliefs important.

On the partisan front, 78% of Republicans say that a candidate's faith is an important consideration, a view shared by 55% of Democrats. However, there is also a significant divide on this topic within the Democratic Party. Among minority Democrats, 71% consider faith and religious beliefs an important consideration for voting. Just 44% of white Democrats agree.

The national telephone survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted by Rasmussen Reports November 16-17, 2006. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evangelicalbigots; latterdaysaints; lds; mittromney; mormon; religiousfreedomdead; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 561-574 next last
To: MeanWestTexan

Dear MeanWestTexan,

It appears that you're right. I find that astounding; I didn't think so many folks so disliked Mormonism that they wouldn't even consider voting for a Mormon.

I don't have a problem voting for Mormons. Heck, I think I did in this last election. I think the Republican candidate for Lt. Gov. in Maryland was a Mormon. Maybe the ticket lost because of the anti-Mormon vote?? ;-)


sitetest


201 posted on 11/20/2006 9:54:02 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
And this shows why women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Interesting that you would say that since it's been all those MALE presidents and politicians who have screwed up so much.

Don't let your misogyny keep you from thinking that you are superior.

202 posted on 11/20/2006 9:54:12 AM PST by Rita Hayworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Are you consistent here? Muslims are perhaps more anti-abortion than many Evangelicals. Does your "spitting" comment apply to them?

Please quote me the verse in any Mormon text that says the infidel should be converted at the sword, enslaved, or put to death. Please cite any example of Mormon jihad.

But yes, I have no problem and will defend moderate peace-loving Muslims who simply want to coexist with those of other religions. There are plenty here in the US, despite the rantings of the "Nuke every Muslim" simpletons.

203 posted on 11/20/2006 9:55:35 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Like, I said right-or-wrong, Romney's a non-starter (for Republicans, anyway --- a MINO could get elected by Dims, I suspect).

Just accept it as unchangeable for now and get us a conservative who can win.


204 posted on 11/20/2006 9:57:18 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: padre35

How about coming up with PRACTICAL alternatives to the obvious ones (which are not created by the media)?


205 posted on 11/20/2006 9:57:45 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I'd be fine with Haley, except he has no chance. Camera's are not his friend and he's from Mississippi and according to the left, that makes him a (gasp)closet racist.

The GOP will carry Mississippi with or without Haley on the ticket.

Who else could we find...?


206 posted on 11/20/2006 9:57:46 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Fred Thompson


207 posted on 11/20/2006 9:58:45 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Southaven Mississippi Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Mr. Law and Order? Talk about gravitas.

How old is he, though?


208 posted on 11/20/2006 9:59:58 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Any that would follow Joseph Smiths clap trap are Moonbats..
Joseph Smith = Infamous "other" Moonbat..
209 posted on 11/20/2006 10:00:28 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

LOL!!!


210 posted on 11/20/2006 10:01:19 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

>> While I would not vote for a Mormon Presidential candidate, I would vote for a Presidential candidate that happened to be Mormon.

Very Very well said!

So, the question in my mind is how conservative can Mitt be if he’s the Governor of Taxachusetts?


211 posted on 11/20/2006 10:02:13 AM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

Yet women vote overwhelmingly Dem.

If you women had your way, you would screw it up worse than all those males combined.


212 posted on 11/20/2006 10:04:21 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Two problems. Fred would have to be willing to take a pay cut. He currently makes over $100,000 per episode of Law and Order.

Second problem: Fred has shown no inclination to run for public office again.


Can't we find one great candidate to rally behind????


213 posted on 11/20/2006 10:06:24 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That's because Mormons don't publically baptise. We have no way of knowing how it is done.

Yes they do. It is done by total immersion under the water, with the prayer: "Having authority given me of Jesus Christ, I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen. "

214 posted on 11/20/2006 10:06:59 AM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

64.


215 posted on 11/20/2006 10:07:24 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
[ Bush might as well start redecorating for Hillary. ]

Exactly.. Except for Newt.. America is courting political Moonbatery..

How many Legal and Illegal Aliens will VOTE in 2008??..
Because Newt Gingrich is UNelectable..

Republicans have ONE VIABLE candidate that WILL BE REJECTED... Just ONE...

She.. whom should not be named.. is a shoe in.. such a Pity too..

216 posted on 11/20/2006 10:07:46 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

let me put it this way - more than 50% of Massachusetts voted for him.


217 posted on 11/20/2006 10:08:01 AM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
but Mormons make great neighbors because they are generally very ethical people. There's no reason why one would not make a good president.

I agree that generally Mormons make great neighbors (for a variety of reasons). Could a Mormon be a good president? I think it's possible.

But I think larger issues are key than simply "could X be a good president?" I think timing is a prominent concern. (In an era where National Security is challenged more than ever, do we want someone who prays to a God distinct from the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as our leader?).

I haven't thought this fully through yet, but we need to ask if having an LDS president will turn out the same public relations way as having Utah host the Olympics?

Functionally, did Utah do a great job of hosting the Olympics? (Yes) Was it used to further spread LDS good will and further its proselytizing efforts? (Yes)

Whether the above is a strong enough reason to vote against someone is another issue. At least, it's an issue to put on the table for discussion.

218 posted on 11/20/2006 10:08:42 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
But yes, I have no problem and will defend moderate peace-loving Muslims who simply want to coexist with those of other religions. There are plenty here in the US, despite the rantings of the "Nuke every Muslim" simpletons.

No, the relevant issue is not will we defend peace-loving Muslims. Of course we will! The relevant issue here is would a candidate being a Muslim keep you from voting for him?

219 posted on 11/20/2006 10:11:08 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I'm old enough to remember when 55% wouldn't have voted for a Catholic, (1960), but they did. I doubt sincerely if these 43% know what a Mormon is. They probably think he's a Moslem. The ignorance of some people is breath-taking. Never assume that they know what you are talking about.


220 posted on 11/20/2006 10:16:54 AM PST by Yankereb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 561-574 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson