Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican may relax rules on condoms
The Times ^ | November 23, 2006 | Richard Owen

Posted on 11/22/2006 11:54:33 PM PST by MadIvan

Pope Benedict XVI is considering concessions over the use of condoms to fight Aids — but the Vatican’s overall ban on condoms will almost certainly remain intact despite the relentless rise in deaths from Aids in Africa, Vatican sources say.

Medical and theological experts advising the Pope have suggested that married couples could be allowed to use condoms when one of the spouses is HIV-positive or a drug user. Vatican watchers said that this would “open a small chink” in the Vatican’s uncompromising opposition to condoms.

There was no question of reversing the basic doctrine laid down in Humanae Vitae, the 1968 encyclical in which Pope Paul VI rejected any relaxation of church rules on birth control. The policy was reiterated by Pope John Paul II and by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, then his head of doctrine and now the pontiff.

According to the annual UN report on Aids, released yesterday before World Aids Day on December 1, there are almost 40 million people living with HIV. The most alarming increase was in Uganda, which experienced a rise from a 5.6 per cent infection rate among men and 6.9 per cent among women in 2000 to 6.5 per cent and 8.8 per cent respectively.

In a speech to African bishops last year Pope Benedict blamed contraception for a breakdown of sexual morality and said that abstinence and marital fidelity were the only effective way to prevent the spread of HIV.

Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragán, head of the Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care, said this week that a 200-page study on the spread of infectious diseases commissioned by the Pope in April had been completed. The cardinal said that the spread of Aids is something that worries the Pope a lot, but added that “no response from the Church can be one that encourages a libertine sexual attitude”.

Some leading Catholic liberals have advocated a policy change, describing condoms as the lesser evil in situations where there is “widespread misery, promiscuity or use of drugs”. These include Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, the former Archbishop of Milan and once a contender for Pope, Monsignor George Cottier, a papal theologian, and Cardinal Godfried Danneels, of Belgium. Such voices are in a minority, however, in the current conservative Vatican climate.

Pope Benedict will meet the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, today before his controversial trip to Turkey next week. Yesterday the Pope announced that he would release the first volume of a study entitled Jesus of Nazareth early next year, saying: “I do not know how much time and strength remain to me.”

He said that the book was not a magisterial statement but a personal reflection, and readers were therefore at liberty to contradict him. The Pope, who will turn 80 next April, was the oldest cardinal to be made Pope for 275 years when elected in April last year.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; condoms; moralabsolutes; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I'm not sure this is a good idea; if one is ill, surely one should have enough love and care for their spouse to keep one's trousers on.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 11/22/2006 11:54:35 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 11/22/2006 11:54:47 PM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The most alarming increase was in Uganda, which experienced a rise from a 5.6 per cent infection rate among men and 6.9 per cent among women in 2000 to 6.5 per cent and 8.8 per cent respectively.

Something needs to be done.
3 posted on 11/23/2006 12:00:12 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I hope this applies to the glow-in-the-dark ones, Night Light, because those are really cool.


4 posted on 11/23/2006 12:08:43 AM PST by Petronius (Isolationism has never been tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

This speculation gets recycled on a regular basis.


5 posted on 11/23/2006 12:37:41 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
Something needs to be done.

The stupid will always be among us.

6 posted on 11/23/2006 12:39:23 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

What do you propose?


7 posted on 11/23/2006 1:05:20 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"I'm not sure this is a good idea; if one is ill, surely one should have enough love and care for their spouse to keep one's trousers on."

Absolutely! It is my understanding that this is the RC Churches teaching.


8 posted on 11/23/2006 1:06:42 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Barmy here. Wouldn't circumcision be as effective? Recently reported in the MSM to significantly reduce HIV incidence. And without contradicting Church doctrine.

Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns. KMA NRA


9 posted on 11/23/2006 1:11:05 AM PST by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I think they should hand them out to every 3rd world nation and make them stop breeding so they won't want to invade our countries.

And if you flame me...I don't care. It's what I feel. We're a losing party at this point, and we've been invaded by illegals who vote. I do not care, flame away. I won't be back to this thread and I won't be "checking" for your replies either, so I'm a losing cause for you flame-war types.

I'm depressed about the Dems winning as well, and have no hope for this country.


10 posted on 11/23/2006 2:38:02 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband (http://community.livejournal.com/sf_conservative/profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband

I agree


11 posted on 11/23/2006 3:06:53 AM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
surely one should have enough love and care for their spouse to keep one's trousers on.

Have you ever considered the possibility that the woman might actually LIKE sex and not want you to keep them on?

12 posted on 11/23/2006 3:18:29 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronius; MadIvan
"I hope this applies to the glow-in-the-dark ones, Night Light, because those are really cool."

Petronius!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To tell you the truth, I have to wonder if this is an appropriate situation for economia. My gut says no, though perhaps in the case of a marriage where one of the partners already is HIV + at the time of the marriage it could be considered. Otherwise, well it could certainly be seen as condoning sex outside of marriage, wrongly for sure but still seen that way. I do have to wonder, however, if the Vatican's ban on condom use really has anything to do with the AIDS problem (again except in the case of an HIV+ spouse). If people are going to have sex outside of marriage, which is pretty clearly forbidden by the Church, why would they scruple about using a condom if they were so motivated?
13 posted on 11/23/2006 4:11:23 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

http://www.aids2006.org/pag/PSession.aspx?s=653 [Excerpt]
Male circumcision associated with decreased HIV infection epidemiologically, One ANRS-South African trial showed a benefit of adult circumcision in decreasing HIV incidence, but some behavioral disinhibition.


14 posted on 11/23/2006 5:05:46 AM PST by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The only reason the catholic church has a ban on married couples using contraception is to ensure the growth rate of the catholic population. I don't know why they aren't just honest about it.


15 posted on 11/23/2006 5:06:01 AM PST by AngloSaxonChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngloSaxonChristian

It seems the "modern" Americans and Europeans have so swallowed the consumerism and Malthususm that they don't have even enough children to replace themselves.This is racial and ethnic suicide.


16 posted on 11/23/2006 5:21:39 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

'It seems the "modern" Americans and Europeans have so swallowed the consumerism and Malthususm that they don't have even enough children to replace themselves.This is racial and ethnic suicide.'

I agree, I just wish the vatican would be straight about it and not keep pretending it's for other reasons.


17 posted on 11/23/2006 5:26:23 AM PST by AngloSaxonChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AngloSaxonChristian
Here.
18 posted on 11/23/2006 5:30:33 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Petronius

From 'The Meaning of Life'(1983 Monty Python)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085959/quotes



Harry Blackitt: Look at them, bloody Catholics, filling the bloody world up with bloody people they can't afford to bloody feed.
Mrs. Blackitt: What are we dear?
Harry Blackitt: Protestant, and fiercely proud of it.
Mrs. Blackitt: Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?
Harry Blackitt: Because... every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.
Mrs. Blackitt: But it's the same with us, Harry.
Harry Blackitt: What do you mean?
Mrs. Blackitt: Well, I mean, we've got two children, and we've had sexual intercourse twice.
Harry Blackitt: That's not the point. We could have it any time we wanted.
Mrs. Blackitt: Really?
Harry Blackitt: Oh, yes, and, what's more, because we don't believe in all that Papist claptrap, we can take precautions.
Mrs. Blackitt: What, you mean... lock the door?
Harry Blackitt: No, no. I mean, because we are members of the Protestant Reformed Church, which successfully challenged the autocratic power of the Papacy in the mid-sixteenth century, we can wear little rubber devices to prevent issue.
Mrs. Blackitt: What d'you mean?
Harry Blackitt: I could, if I wanted, have sexual intercourse with you...
Mrs. Blackitt: Oh, yes, Harry.
Harry Blackitt: ...and, by wearing a rubber sheath over my old feller, I could insure... that, when I came off, you would not be impregnated.
Mrs. Blackitt: Ooh.
Harry Blackitt: That's what being a Protestant's all about. That's why it's the church for me. That's why it's the church for anyone who respects the individual and the individual's right to decide for him or herself. When Martin Luther nailed his protest up to the church door in fifteen-seventeen, he may not have realised the full significance of what he was doing, but four hundred years later, thanks to him, my dear, I can wear whatever I want on my John Thomas...
[sniff]
Harry Blackitt: ... and, Protestantism doesn't stop at the simple condom. Oh, no. I can wear French Ticklers if I want.
Mrs. Blackitt: You what?
Harry Blackitt: French Ticklers. Black Mambos. Crocodile Ribs. Sheaths that are designed not only to protect, but also to enhance the stimulation of sexual congress.
Mrs. Blackitt: Have you got one?
Harry Blackitt: Have I got one? Uh, well, no, but I can go down the road any time I want and walk into Harry's and hold my head up high and say in a loud, steady voice, 'Harry, I want you to sell me a condom. In fact, today, I think I'll have a French Tickler, for I am a Protestant.'
Mrs. Blackitt: Well, why don't you?
Harry Blackitt: But they - Well, they cannot, 'cause their church never made the great leap out of the Middle Ages and the domination of alien Episcopal supremacy.


19 posted on 11/23/2006 5:58:15 AM PST by flixxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; kiriath_jearim; Gadfly-At-Large; pryncessraych; aroostook war; TheRake; rogator; ...

+

If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!



20 posted on 11/23/2006 6:04:46 AM PST by narses (St Thomas says ? lex injusta non obligat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson