Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If you're a nostalgic liberal, this film is for you. It takes place at the Ambassador Hotel, which once stood on Wilshire Blvd. in Los Angeles, on the day of the California primary election of 1968.

One thing the film doesn't tell you is that the Democrats were not the only ones holding a post-election party that night. In another ballroom, Republicans celebrating Max Rafferty's primary victory over incumbent Senator Tom Kuchel, a liberal Republican, in the US Senate race. Rafferty, who was California's Superintendent of Public Instruction, was backed by the party's conservative wing. However, although the Rafferty event took place in the same building, the movie makes no mention of it.

By the way, the Ambassador Hotel's cafeteria, which is accurately portrayed in the film, featured some of the best hamburgers in Los Angeles.

1 posted on 11/24/2006 11:01:04 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Fiji Hill

What would the Estevez/Sheen clan have for careers if it weren't for the Kennedy family (or similar) liberal political dramas? B-O-R-I-N-G !!


45 posted on 11/24/2006 12:08:22 PM PST by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill
Pretty much the story of BOBBY Thursday, November 23, 2006
By Michael Janusonis
Journal Arts Writer

Soap-operatic Bobby won’t make history

Although the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy is the reason behind actor-writer-director Emilio Estevez’s long-in-preparation Bobby, Kennedy himself is barely in the film.

He’s occasionally seen in newsreel footage, usually as a face on a TV screen. The emotional finale of the film, which re-creates the assassination of the senator in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel, in Los Angeles, in the early morning hours of June 5, 1968, shortly after Kennedy won the hotly contested California presidential primary, is a combination of new footage restaged by Estevez and newsreel footage taken at the time. (You can always tell the new footage because Kennedy is only seen out of focus or from the rear in it.)

An actor playing Sirhan Sirhan, the assassin, is seen even more briefly, uttering only a few words as he pulls the trigger.

Rather than a replay of historic facts, Estevez has “re-imagined” June 4, 1968, the day leading up to RFK’s victory speech early the next morning, with 22 fictional characters. They range from a hotel switchboard operator involved in an adulterous affair with the hotel manager to a young man who is trying to avoid serving in Vietnam by marrying a pretty friend. They’re all placed at the hotel on June 4 and their little stories, shuffled back and forth in the editing room, all play out while leading up to RFK’s assassination that night.

More

I did notice in the trailer, one comment made is: "Johnson got us into this war."

Eisenhower (the Peacemaker in Korea) had considered the use of American combat troops in Vietnam, but knew it would be difficult to gain political support. Bobby Kennedy, was willing to let history know exactly what his brother's intentions in Vietnam had been as early as 1964 and 1965, before it was called "Johnson's War."

In a series of oral history interviews for the JFK Library, RFK said that "it was worthwhile for psychological, political reasons" to stay in Vietnam.

RFK said: "The President felt that he had a strong, overwhelming reason for being in Vietnam and that we should win the war in Vietnam....If you lost Vietnam, I think everybody was quite clear that the rest of Southeast Asia would fall." (32)
John Bartlow Martin point-blank asked RFK: "if the President was convinced that the United States had to stay in Vietnam." The one-word response was "Yes." (33)

Source

51 posted on 11/24/2006 12:16:01 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill

Did the movie end with a bang.

Hee Hee.

Stupid Kennedies.


62 posted on 11/24/2006 12:32:36 PM PST by exile (Mrs. Exile - "Yes you're the greatest husband ever, now put on some pants")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill
I’m Michael Medved for Eye on Entertainment

Medved, is the living embodiment of the expression, "If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, If you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain."

He was a liberal back then but age has fortunately brought wisdom to him.

I have heard Medved speak about this night. He was a witness to the assassination and he has no tolerance of anyone who suggests that Sirhan was not the killer.
65 posted on 11/24/2006 12:33:36 PM PST by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump


68 posted on 11/24/2006 12:36:44 PM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Here's another thread, from another board, on the Kennedy cult...

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php/topic,46997.0.html

ff

72 posted on 11/24/2006 12:43:18 PM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1952393,00.html

Did the CIA kill Bobby Kennedy?


In 1968, Robert Kennedy seemed likely to follow his brother, John, into the White House. Then, on June 6, he was assassinated - apparently by a lone gunman. But Shane O'Sullivan says he has evidence implicating three CIA agents in the murder

Monday November 20, 2006
The Guardian


At first, it seems an open-and-shut case. On June 5 1968, Robert Kennedy wins the California Democratic primary and is set to challenge Richard Nixon for the White House. After midnight, he finishes his victory speech at the Ambassador hotel in Los Angeles and is shaking hands with kitchen staff in a crowded pantry when 24-year-old Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan steps down from a tray-stacker with a "sick, villainous smile" on his face and starts firing at Kennedy with an eight-shot revolver.


As Kennedy lies dying on the pantry floor, Sirhan is arrested as the lone assassin. He carries the motive in his shirt-pocket (a clipping about Kennedy's plans to sell bombers to Israel) and notebooks at his house seem to incriminate him. But the autopsy report suggests Sirhan could not have fired the shots that killed Kennedy. Witnesses place Sirhan's gun several feet in front of Kennedy, but the fatal bullet is fired from one inch behind. And more bullet-holes are found in the pantry than Sirhan's gun can hold, suggesting a second gunman is involved. Sirhan's notebooks show a bizarre series of "automatic writing" - "RFK must die RFK must be killed - Robert F Kennedy must be assassinated before 5 June 68" - and even under hypnosis, he has never been able to remember shooting Kennedy. He recalls "being led into a dark place by a girl who wanted coffee", then being choked by an angry mob. Defence psychiatrists conclude he was in a trance at the time of the shooting and leading psychiatrists suggest he may have be a hypnotically programmed assassin.
Three years ago, I started writing a screenplay about the assassination of Robert Kennedy, caught up in a strange tale of second guns and "Manchurian candidates" (as the movie termed brainwashed assassins). As I researched the case, I uncovered new video and photographic evidence suggesting that three senior CIA operatives were behind the killing. I did not buy the official ending that Sirhan acted alone, and started dipping into the nether-world of "assassination research", crossing paths with David Sanchez Morales, a fearsome Yaqui Indian.

Morales was a legendary figure in CIA covert operations. According to close associate Tom Clines, if you saw Morales walking down the street in a Latin American capital, you knew a coup was about to happen. When the subject of the Kennedys came up in a late-night session with friends in 1973, Morales launched into a tirade that finished: "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a bitch and I was in Los Angeles when we got the little bastard." From this line grew my odyssey into the spook world of the 60s and the secrets behind the death of Bobby Kennedy.

Working from a Cuban photograph of Morales from 1959, I viewed news coverage of the assassination to see if I could spot the man the Cubans called El Gordo - The Fat One. Fifteen minutes in, there he was, standing at the back of the ballroom, in the moments between the end of Kennedy's speech and the shooting. Thirty minutes later, there he was again, casually floating around the darkened ballroom while an associate with a pencil moustache took notes.

The source of early research on Morales was Bradley Ayers, a retired US army captain who had been seconded to JM-Wave, the CIA's Miami base in 1963, to work closely with chief of operations Morales on training Cuban exiles to run sabotage raids on Castro. I tracked Ayers down to a small town in Wisconsin and emailed him stills of Morales and another guy I found suspicious - a man who is pictured entering the ballroom from the direction of the pantry moments after the shooting, clutching a small container to his body, and being waved towards an exit by a Latin associate.

Ayers' response was instant. He was 95% sure that the first figure was Morales and equally sure that the other man was Gordon Campbell, who worked alongside Morales at JM-Wave in 1963 and was Ayers' case officer shortly before the JFK assassination.

I put my script aside and flew to the US to interview key witnesses for a documentary on the unfolding story. In person, Ayers positively identified Morales and Campbell and introduced me to David Rabern, a freelance operative who was part of the Bay of Pigs invasion force in 1961 and was at the Ambassador hotel that night. He did not know Morales and Campbell by name but saw them talking to each other out in the lobby before the shooting and assumed they were Kennedy's security people. He also saw Campbell around police stations three or four times in the year before Robert Kennedy was shot.

This was odd. The CIA had no domestic jurisdiction and Morales was stationed in Laos in 1968. With no secret service protection for presidential candidates in those days, Kennedy was guarded by unarmed Olympic decathlete champion Rafer Johnson and football tackler Rosey Grier - no match for an expert assassination team.

Trawling through microfilm of the police investigation, I found further photographs of Campbell with a third figure, standing centre-stage in the Ambassador hotel hours before the shooting. He looked Greek, and I suspected he might be George Joannides, chief of psychological warfare operations at JM-Wave. Joannides was called out of retirement in 1978 to act as the CIA liaison to the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) investigating the death of John F Kennedy.

Ed Lopez, now a respected lawyer at Cornell University, came into close contact with Joann-des when he was a young law student working for the committee. We visit him and show him the photograph and he is 99% sure it is Joannides. When I tell him where it was taken, he is not surprised: "If these guys decided you were bad, they acted on it.

We move to Washington to meet Wayne Smith, a state department official for 25 years who knew Morales well at the US embassy in Havana in 1959-60. When we show him the video in the ballroom, his response is instant: "That's him, that's Morales." He remembers Morales at a cocktail party in Buenos Aires in 1975, saying Kennedy got what was coming to him. Is there a benign explanation for his presence? For Kennedy's security, maybe? Smith laughs. Morales is the last person you would want to protect Bobby Kennedy, he says. He hated the Kennedys, blaming their lack of air support for the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.

We meet Clines in a hotel room near CIA headquarters. He does not want to go on camera and brings a friend, which is a little unnerving. Clines remembers "Dave" fondly. The guy in the video looks like Morales but it is not him, he says: "This guy is fatter and Morales walked with more of a slouch and his tie down." To me, the guy in the video does walk with a slouch and his tie is down.

Clines says he knew Joannides and Campbell and it is not them either, but he fondly remembers Ayers bringing snakes into JM-Wave to scare the secretaries and seems disturbed at Smith's identification of Morales. He does not discourage our investigation and suggests others who might be able to help. A seasoned journalist cautions that he would expect Clines "to blow smoke", and yet it seems his honest opinion.

As we leave Los Angeles, I tell the immigration officer that I am doing a story on Bobby Kennedy. She has seen the advertisements for the new Emilio Estevez movie about the assassination, Bobby. "Who do you think did it? I think it was the Mob," she says before I can answer.

"I definitely think it was more than one man," I say, discreetly.

Morales died of a heart attack in 1978, weeks before he was to be called before the HSCA. Joannides died in 1990. Campbell may still be out there somewhere, in his early 80s. Given the positive identifications we have gathered on these three, the CIA and the Los Angeles Police Department need to explain what they were doing there. Lopez believes the CIA should call in and interview everybody who knew them, disclose whether they were on a CIA operation and, if not, why they were there that night.

Today would have been Robert Kennedy's 81st birthday. The world is crying out for a compassionate leader like him. If dark forces were behind his elimination, it needs to be investigated

· Shane O'Sullivan's investigation will be shown tonight on Newsnight, BBC2, 10.30pm.


73 posted on 11/24/2006 12:46:26 PM PST by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill
I saw Emilio Estevez on Leno talking about writing the movie, said he had writers' block and went up to Big Sur area to get away from distractions and it turned out the hotel desk lady was there that night and told her story to him -- he based his Lindsey Lohan character on this lady...

At any rate, the trailer keeps showing the kitchen help saying "I didn't cross the border, the border crossed me" and I won't go see the movie because of that trailer. That has nothing to do with 1968, but rather the Sheen's support for illegal immigration.

78 posted on 11/24/2006 1:12:23 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill
(VANITY)

Interesting to see this reference. I thought I was the only one who remembered that Rafferty was at the hotel that night as well. I came over from U of A in Tucson to work in the Rafferty campaign, and after days of walking through the smog to drop literature at homes in Altadena, I was at the Ambassador that night.

I had ridden there with several others. Rafferty was on the first floor and the Kennedy folk were in the basement. My ride needed to head home, so it was about 10-15 minutes after we left the hotel that we heard live on the radio the sounds of the shooting. The returns were far from complete at that point, and the assassination dominated the news far into the night and morning.

Interesting how different a state it was then. Max ran a strong race in November against Cranston. No chance that anyone that conservative could take the state today.
82 posted on 11/24/2006 1:17:05 PM PST by Amish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill
Though I deplore anybody getting assassinated, this Kennedy Camelot myth is getting a tad tiresome.

I realize this Camelot myth gives the moon bat liberal something to juxtapose their version of reality against the hard cold cruel facts of life

Democrats are good, republican are evil.

87 posted on 11/24/2006 1:53:34 PM PST by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fiji Hill

Michael Medved's comments (and his liberal past) aside, what else is there to say about Bobby K except that he didn't dodge a bullet but the rest of us did...


88 posted on 11/24/2006 1:54:47 PM PST by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson