Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
Forty-five years is a long time. Technology can be expected to make great strides in that time.

There are a great many technologies on the horizon that may have great impact on these figures

High temperature super conductors could reduce line losses in electric power transmission increasing effective power output 20%.

It is conceivable that nuclear fusion could become practical in that time frame generating cheap carbon free power (Whoopee).

And there are always new unexpected discoveries popping up. Who knows what might happen.

If we don’t solve the problem energy will become more expensive and demand will be reduced in response and again the problem will solve itself.

But I expect that if government stays out of the way the market will produce adequate power to meet demand. Left to itself the market will produce energy much more abundantly and cheaply than any government agency could imagine.

8 posted on 11/25/2006 10:04:05 PM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac
"On the other hand if the world's 9 billion in 2050 adopted India's current living standards, the world would need to produce only 4 TW of power."

There's a great idea </sarc> from the article. The piece also suggests that if we generate power from rivers and wind farms, it would solve a large part of this problem. That is, if Ted Kennedy and the greenies ever allow it to happen.

In keeping with the musical sub theme of this thread, it occurs to me that is a good band name: Ted Kennedy and The Greenies. Of course, they would suck.

38 posted on 11/26/2006 5:22:24 AM PST by sig226 (See my profile for a list of democrat criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson