To: shrinkermd
>>
By 2005 (the latest data), that number had dropped to 12 percent...
<<
For those who are able, let's do some math.
In the Washington, DC school system, I recently read that the average per pupil expenditure was $13,000 per year. Putting aside if that includes the entire costs such as the capital for the buildings, that implies if a youth stays in the system all 12 years and there is no inflation, it costs a staggering $156,000 for his education.
But it gets worse: If only 12% of graduates are proficient at their grade level, it then costs $156,000 / 0.12 = $1.3 Million to graduate a single youth who is proficient.
!!!
How big will this number have to get before the public will allow alternatives to the current government school model?
To: theBuckwheat; leda
Your DC cost numbers are too low, and you have neglected to factor in the appalling graduation rate (can't remember the number, but it is less than 50%). Thus, your cost per profficient graduate is probably about five times what you calculated.
15 posted on
11/26/2006 6:20:32 AM PST by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: theBuckwheat
16 posted on
11/26/2006 6:26:28 AM PST by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: theBuckwheat
Putting aside if that includes the entire costs such as the capital for the buildings,... Most school district budgets that I've seen maintain two separate accounts: The 'operating budget', paid with annual tax income, generally doesn't include the 'infrastructure costs', paid with long-term bond measures.
Doing this understates the true total cost but does make some sense from an accounting perspective. You still own the building for many years after you've pi$$ed away each year's operating budget.
27 posted on
11/26/2006 8:58:46 AM PST by
Bob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson