1 posted on
11/29/2006 3:35:55 AM PST by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
Maybe I missed it since I only scanned the article, but they didn't seem to have the guts to show the statistics of programs that don't work, instead focusing on a few that do.
2 posted on
11/29/2006 4:19:50 AM PST by
libertylover
(If it's good and decent, you can be sure the Democrat Party leaders are against it.)
To: Zakeet
The media doesn't 'do' science, it abuses it for its own purposes.
Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns. NRA KMA
3 posted on
11/29/2006 4:25:08 AM PST by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: Zakeet
Among ex-cons who held higher-skilled jobs for one month, the New York State Department of Correctional Services found, the recidivism rate was 24 percent. For those who held the jobs for six months, it was 13 percent.Typical meaningless social statistics.
4 posted on
11/29/2006 4:53:54 AM PST by
joshhiggins
(O you who believe! do not take the MUSLIMS for friends)
To: Zakeet
If this is a true means of evaluation, Let's test every government program
There will be lots of very nice buildings in DC that can be used as 5 star hotels or converted into condo
5 posted on
11/29/2006 5:00:53 AM PST by
Popman
("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
To: Zakeet
What they didn't include is a list of social programs that not only work but don't steal money from people who work for a living. Here it is
6 posted on
11/29/2006 5:05:02 AM PST by
3Lean
To: Zakeet
By a new approach, they mean analysis of outcomes.
I guess the old approach was inattention.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson