Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional Dems to take over Republican Bible Study room
The Hill ^ | Nov 29, 2006 | Patrick O'Connor

Posted on 11/29/2006 10:48:41 AM PST by OldGuard1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: OldGuard1
Latest word is that the Republican Bible Study Room will be converted to the NAMBLA lounge. Online access to kiddie porn is already being installed.
21 posted on 11/29/2006 11:23:39 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: OldGuard1
Keith Ellison will need a prayer room, and is probably measuring rugs as we speak.
23 posted on 11/29/2006 11:26:07 AM PST by Minnesocold ("If you are going through hell... keep going." - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldGuard1

Perhaps they will now convert it into room to plan how they can look "Christian" in front of religious voters.


24 posted on 11/29/2006 11:26:16 AM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

You would figure Nancy would rather move into Tip O'Neill's old office rather than Newt's/Hastert's.

Unless, of course, she has been using Tip's old office since being elected Dem leader and has decided she wants a new office.


25 posted on 11/29/2006 11:27:05 AM PST by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Talking about San Francisco values, I was sent the following via email. Take a look! The press conference talks a lot about San Francisco values.

This is a great video clip of a press conference out in SF

FINALLY! A BOSS WITH BALLS
Background: San Francisco Police Officer Nick Birco was killed July 26, 2006 when his police car was struck by a stolen van occupied by suspects who had just committed an armed robbery and were being pursued by SFPD units. This video was of a press conference given by a member of the SFPD brass. This demonstrates how administrators should act.


http://mfile.akamai.com/12948/wmv/vod.ibsys.com/2006/0728/9591734.300k.asx


26 posted on 11/29/2006 11:31:39 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Yeah....EXCEPT...when the Pubs won in 94 they did NOT make the Dems move out of their Speaker's headquarters

Yeah, but do you know the reason why? It's because the Republicans already had the good offices, and have had them continuously since 1953.

By the mid-1950's, control of the House had changed three or four times within a decade, going back and forth nearly every mid-term election. The Democrats won back the House in the 1954 mid-terms, but Speaker Sam Rayburn assumed the GOP would just win it back again during the Eisenhower re-election year of 1956. So he didn't bother to go to the trouble of having the Democrats take back the good offices, for what he thought would be only two years. Well, the GOP didn't win back the House for another 40 years, but in the meantime, they never surrendered those good offices. So they didn't need to take them back in 1994. They already had them.

27 posted on 11/29/2006 11:37:11 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OldGuard1

Answer.... find another room..


28 posted on 11/29/2006 11:37:58 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldGuard1

The islamist Ellison is a democrat. I'm sure they're very proud.


29 posted on 11/29/2006 11:52:31 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Here's a link to the article that mentions how the Republicans never gave up the better offices when the Democrats won back the House in 1954:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=no_thanks,_were_stupid&ns=TonyBlankley&dt=10/18/2006&page=2

The relevant excerpt:

"In 1954, the Democrats, led by the great Sam Rayburn, retook the House after control had seesawed back and forth for 10 years (1944-Democrat; 1946-Republican; 1948-Democrat; 1950-Democrat; 1952-Republican; 1954-Democrat)

"Sam Rayburn (one of the shrewdest politicians ever to play the game) was so sure that the Republicans would take back the House in the Eisenhower re-election year of 1956, that when he became Speaker after the 1954 election, he didn't even bother to move his furniture back to the better office suite occupied by Joe Martin (the Republican Speaker who returned to Minority leader status after the 1954 Republican loss.) They decided to keep their previous office spaces rather than go through the bother of moving across the hall.

"As it turned out, the Republicans didn't re-take a majority of the House for 40 years (The Gingrich-led election of 1994). So for 40 years the Republican minority leaders got to keep the better office space (that looked out over the majestic Washington Mall), while the Democratic Speakers for 40 years got a view of the parking lot."


30 posted on 11/29/2006 11:52:48 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor

That's interesting. More interesting, IMO, is the question: WHY are there noticable differences in the quality of the offices?

I could see maybe a couple unique offices for the Speaker or Whips, and of course conference rooms ... but what brilliant mind designed the remainder of the 435 offices so that there were 'good' and 'bad' ones?

I'd love to see a couple pictures of the best and worst offices.


31 posted on 11/29/2006 12:01:47 PM PST by No.6 (www.fourthfightergroup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor

Thanks. Interesting. I'd like to see pictures, and a diagram of who has what offices.....might be interesting.


32 posted on 11/29/2006 12:32:54 PM PST by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

The Pagan caucus of the Democrat party will certainly want to convert it to a Wiccan chapel; if Keith Ellison (M-MN) doesn't want it for a mosque.


33 posted on 11/29/2006 12:38:08 PM PST by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

And you are dead sure about this?


34 posted on 11/29/2006 1:04:38 PM PST by twonie (Just because there are fewer of us don't mean we are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson