Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OpusatFR
C'mon. It's really not at all about gluttony and you should know that from the title of the thread, if nothing else.

It's about coercive lawsuits and the government with their experts deciding what the citizenry can and can not eat.

52 posted on 12/01/2006 4:35:40 PM PST by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: HoosierHawk

"C'mon. It's really not at all about gluttony and you should know that..."

Yup, I know, but until we start calling it what it is and take back the language to define the problem, the nannies will win.

It is like bulemia. I've watched a person not eat to stay thin and then stuff themselves and vomit. Binge and purge is soothed away by lots of psychobabble, but it's a form of gluttony too. It's also a sin in my mind to waste food in that manner...very Imperial Rome.

~But we can't define things as sin..wouldn't want to make anyone feel bad or responsible.


67 posted on 12/01/2006 4:55:30 PM PST by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson