Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X-ray screening for airline passengers to be tested in Phoenix
Fox11AZ.com ^ | December 1, 2006 | AP

Posted on 12/01/2006 6:33:03 PM PST by annie laurie

PHOENIX (AP) -- Sky Harbor International Airport here will test a controversial new federal screening system that takes X-rays of passenger's bodies in an effort to find concealed explosives and other weapons.

The technology, called backscatter, has been around for several years but has not been widely used in the U.S. as an anti-terrorism tool because of privacy concerns.

The Transportation Security Administration said it has found a way to refine the machine's images so that the normally graphic pictures can be blurred in certain areas while still being effective in detecting bombs and other threats.

The agency is expected to provide more information about the technology later this month but said one machine will be up and running at Sky Harbor's Terminal 4 by Christmas.

The security agency's Web site indicates that the technology will be used initially as a secondary screening measure, meaning that only those passengers who first fail the standard screening process will be directed to the X-ray area.

Even then, passengers will have the option of choosing the backscatter or a traditional pat-down search.

A handful of other U.S. airports will have the X-rays machines in place by early 2007 as part of a nationwide pilot program, TSA officials said.

The technology already is being used in prisons and by drug enforcement agents, and has been tested at London's Heathrow Airport.

The security agency says the machines will be effective in helping detect plastic or liquid explosives and other non-metallic weapons that can be missed by standard metal detectors.

Some say the high-resolution images - which clearly depict the outline of the passenger's body, plus anything attached to it, such as jewelry - go too far.

But the TSA said the X-rays will be set up so that the image can be viewed only by a security officer in a remote location. Other passengers, and even the agent at the checkpoint, will not have access to the picture.

In addition, the system will be configured so that the X-ray will be immediately deleted as soon as the individual steps away from the machine. It will not be stored or available for printing or transmitting, agency spokesman Nico Melendez said.


TOPICS: US: Arizona; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airport; backscatter; bigbrother; phoenix; privacy; security; skyharbor; tsa; wot; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2006 6:33:09 PM PST by annie laurie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Sample photo here:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/terror/images/061201xray.jpg


2 posted on 12/01/2006 6:34:01 PM PST by annie laurie (All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

3 posted on 12/01/2006 6:35:42 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
GAAAaaakkk!!!!!

Hazardous duty pay required.

X-Ray this:


4 posted on 12/01/2006 6:40:57 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie; dighton; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim

The TSA sure is going through a helluva lot of trouble just to get a picture of my goolies.


5 posted on 12/01/2006 6:42:48 PM PST by Petronski (BRABANTIO: Thou art a villain. IAGO: You are--a senator. ---Othello I.i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

And of course this is getting fierce opposaition with people worried the pictures will end up on the net & used in blackmail in some cases where the person xrayed is recognized by someone- As well, not sure what the radiation amount is, but my goodness- they say you should onyl be exposed to 1 xray (at hospital- typical xray that is) per year- I'm not even sure they are sure just how much is safe- http://sacredscoop.com


6 posted on 12/01/2006 6:43:03 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

I think they should start this in Portland.


7 posted on 12/01/2006 6:44:42 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Welcome Home, son! You and your comrades are our heroes!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
The TSA sure is going through a helluva lot of trouble just to get a picture of my goolies.

The claim is that it wouldn't show that part of your body. It would be blurred out or something. It still seems creepy.

8 posted on 12/01/2006 6:45:47 PM PST by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

They claim the radiation dosage is very low. But, either way I keep wondering about if someone is pregnant.


9 posted on 12/01/2006 6:46:56 PM PST by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy; Miss Behave; cyborg; Toddsterpatriot; nopardons
The claim is that it wouldn't show that part of your body.

Not if it is wrapped in aluminum foil.

You know, as a precaution.

10 posted on 12/01/2006 6:47:38 PM PST by Petronski (BRABANTIO: Thou art a villain. IAGO: You are--a senator. ---Othello I.i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

I had a new one this week, was asked to step into a GE-labelled booth that blew several jets of air at me in an apparent attempt to detect explosives.


11 posted on 12/01/2006 6:51:33 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

12 posted on 12/01/2006 6:52:29 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
I had a new one this week, was asked to step into a GE-labelled booth that blew several jets of air at me in an apparent attempt to detect explosives.

If you paid more than five bucks for that, you're going to the wrong clubs.

13 posted on 12/01/2006 6:53:47 PM PST by Petronski (BRABANTIO: Thou art a villain. IAGO: You are--a senator. ---Othello I.i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
How long before the pics are posted on the Internet?
14 posted on 12/01/2006 7:10:28 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I think you're trying to smuggle a picture onto this forum...


15 posted on 12/01/2006 7:22:28 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Phoenix again.


16 posted on 12/01/2006 7:25:11 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
This is a sample of how they covered it here:

I would not want to be heavy set and step in. Look at him. Heck, I don't want to step in anyway. Seems humiliating.

17 posted on 12/01/2006 7:38:52 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

Talk about disrespecting the dead.

Man that is one horrible human being.


18 posted on 12/01/2006 7:46:39 PM PST by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
Recent x-ray of Nancy Pelosi.


19 posted on 12/01/2006 8:04:26 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

You should be taken out and shot for posting that! And I was having a pretty good night till you...

There is NOT a word in any language that can fit how fuggin wuggly she is. And she has the mental facilities of a turd to boot.


20 posted on 12/01/2006 8:06:54 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson