To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.
To: Paleo Conservative
3 posted on
12/01/2006 8:42:43 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: Paleo Conservative
Bad idea as far as I'm concerned. Not only could the system go stupid and crash the plane but just watch what would happen if terrorists or a hostile foreign government managed to figure out to manipulate the system.
Reminds me of the book Skyhook.
4 posted on
12/01/2006 8:45:46 PM PST by
COEXERJ145
(Just one day without polls would be nice.)
To: Paleo Conservative
10 posted on
12/01/2006 8:49:56 PM PST by
El Sordo
To: Paleo Conservative
11 posted on
12/01/2006 8:49:59 PM PST by
El Sordo
To: Paleo Conservative
Here's another security feature every commercial aircraft should have to discourage terrorism.
19 posted on
12/01/2006 8:53:16 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Paleo Conservative
I'm thinking "RoboPilot". It doesn't conjure up happy thoughts as a passenger.
To: Paleo Conservative
27 posted on
12/01/2006 9:09:51 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: Paleo Conservative
Getting a patent is one thing; implementing it to DO-178B Level A is quite another.
That sort of thing ain't cheap.
A couple of pistols in the cockpit and adequately trained pilots would be much more cost-effective.
29 posted on
12/01/2006 9:20:11 PM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Good idea. Thanks, Boeing.
32 posted on
12/01/2006 9:22:34 PM PST by
Silly
(Still being... Silly)
To: Paleo Conservative
What's with the islamic symbol in the diagrams?
35 posted on
12/01/2006 9:32:35 PM PST by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I think the idea is okay but the execution would have to many unknown consequences.
I think the system they have developed now (which really mostly an integration of several dormant systems) is plenty good, with the F16's to shoot down being the very last part to the terrorist denial system.
39 posted on
12/01/2006 9:52:44 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: Brian Allen
41 posted on
12/01/2006 10:09:16 PM PST by
B4Ranch
(Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
To: Paleo Conservative
The post positive and cheapest anti terrorist device is an armed pilot with a 40 cal. H&K. You never know who is carrying.
51 posted on
12/02/2006 5:10:34 AM PST by
G-Man 1
To: Paleo Conservative
Sounds like the start of Nelson DeMille's The Lion's Game.
54 posted on
12/02/2006 7:06:29 AM PST by
Tribune7
To: Paleo Conservative
these airplanes can autoland now, I don't think this is a big or bad deal
58 posted on
12/02/2006 8:35:18 AM PST by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
To: Paleo Conservative
If Al Qaeda terrorists tried to commandeer several airplanes like they did on 9/11, their utility as homocide bombs would be void. Because if the airplane's computer detected someone at the controls other the authorized pilots, any one else would be locked out of the system. Also, Boeing's invention would make terrorists' attempts to fly with hostages aboard to an extradition-free country a thing of the past. Of course a system like this could be circumvented but the idea of a multi-layered security protocol is still a sound one. It would defeat all but the most hardened professional terrorists from even thinking of taking over an airplane. And that would save lives. Congrats to Boeing for pulling it off!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
61 posted on
12/02/2006 3:16:33 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Paleo Conservative; B4Ranch
<< .... pilots may decide to open the lockable, bullet-proof cockpit doors and federal air marshals may be overpowered and de-armed .... >>
But was the Second Amendment to the united States Constitution be given its untrammeled sway and dominion there would, insofar as airline safety is concerned, be no need for any other consideration.
I wanna see every air-crew member, every passenger, every stewardess and even every cabin poofter packing.
63 posted on
12/02/2006 11:06:53 PM PST by
Brian Allen
("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
To: Paleo Conservative
First time I've seen a crescent moon in a decision tree...
64 posted on
12/03/2006 4:01:12 PM PST by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson