Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyesPlease
"Miller didn't present any evidence of a sawed off shotgun's utility as a militia weapon."

He wasn't there. He flew the coop.

"The court found, because of a lack of evidence to the contrary, that such a shotgun was not appropriate for militia use."

The U.S. Supreme Court, not having the authority to make that determination, kicked it back to the lower court for them to hear testimony. Since Miller was gone to parts unknown, they let it drop.

No decisions were made one way or the other. But since the U.S. Supreme Court asked the question, that gives us an idea what they were thinking.

30 posted on 12/04/2006 4:37:24 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
He wasn't there. He flew the coop.

Since he wasn't under indictment, he had no obligation to show up.

Since Miller was gone to parts unknown, they let it drop.

Miller was dead. His co-defendant was not, however; the government for some reason decided to offer a plea-bargain instead of going ahead with prosecution and have some creative reporting fill in the gaps.

32 posted on 12/04/2006 4:40:59 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson