Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChurtleDawg; woofie
It looks like the situation in Iraq is not quite as bad as stated in this report. To some extent this is a political strategy to greatly lower the public's expectations for where Iraq will be in 2008, so that the Bush administration has some chance of exceeding expectations in its remaining two years. Outside of Baghdad and Anbar province, Iraq really isn't doing too badly. Oil production is way up over a couple of years ago and the main problem is a stubborn insurgency in Anbar province and a lot of violence in Baghdad provoked to some extent by Iran and Syria. Note that Gen. Abazaid said recently that he did not sense despair among his commanders and troops in Iraq, but he felt the despair in Washington. I wouldn't be surprised if the situation in Iraq begins to exceed public expectations sometime in the second half of next year. Meanwhile we need Iraq as a base for military and intelligence operations in Iran if and when those operations are necessary.

The MSM may get snookered here by overstating the problems in Iraq and calling it a total disaster, only to have the country stabilize next year. I will laugh if and when that happens.

17 posted on 12/06/2006 3:40:25 PM PST by defenderSD (Continually amused by the simple-minded writers at the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: defenderSD

That makes sense ...hope you are right


18 posted on 12/06/2006 4:04:36 PM PST by woofie (This area deemed a failure, Something new and witty will no doubt emerge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson