Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats React Warily to the Baker Report
Time ^ | Dec. 07, 2006 | DOUGLAS WALLER

Posted on 12/08/2006 3:27:54 AM PST by Mo1

With the Bush administration on the defensive in the wake of the strong critique of its Iraq policies by the Iraq Study Group, the Democrats might be expected to be cheering. But key Democrats in Congress are keeping their distance from the report. Critics of the war opponents obviously liked the report's stark portrayal of the deteriorating situation in Iraq and its blunt assessment of failed Bush administration policies there. But while seeking to "pivot off that to put it squarely back in the lap of the President to propose a way forward in Iraq," in the words of one senior Democratic aide, "there's definitely a sense of wariness up here on Capitol Hill."

Take Nancy Pelosi, the future House Speaker. While one of the fiercest congressional critics of Bush and the war, she promised only that her party would give the report's recommendations "full consideration" — not its stamp of approval. Pelosi has been leery of the commission from the start, because she had no hand in picking its Democratic members. Normally legislation setting up such blue- ribbon panels has a clause specifying that congressional Democratic and Republican leaders will have a hand in picking members. But the measure creating this panel, sponsored by GOP Congressman Frank Wolf, left those choices up to the co-chairs, former Secretary of State James Baker and former Indiana Rep. Lee Hamilton. Pelosi "didn't think the commission was constituted properly," says a friend. "That annoyed her."

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; theiraqstudygroup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2006 3:27:55 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Democrats cannot take a position --- that is why they treat the report with caution, regardless how much is is aligned with their worldview.


2 posted on 12/08/2006 3:31:11 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Well .. they are in charge of Congress now and should take a stand

Put up or shut up


3 posted on 12/08/2006 3:32:12 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

ON THE NET...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1750277/posts?page=7#7


4 posted on 12/08/2006 3:34:14 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Well, they saw J F'n K's mistake of taking both positions so now that they are back in power we're going to see two years of them taking no position.


5 posted on 12/08/2006 3:34:28 AM PST by libs_kma (Monica blew while Al-Queda grew.....Oh well, Clinton happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Well .. they are in charge of Congress now and should take a stand .

You mean, how Bill Clinton took a stand on issues?!

Don't you learn from history. These people NEVER take a stand.

6 posted on 12/08/2006 3:36:35 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Pelosi "didn't think the commission was constituted properly," says a friend. "That annoyed her."

Read: Nancy was left out and there are too many Clintonistas in the group, making her look even less infuential and relevant.

Joseph Biden, who will take over the Foreign Relations Committee in January, was miffed that the commission dismissed his proposal to federalize Iraq, setting up Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish regions run by largely autonomous governments.

Right...because we know how partitioning areas of the Middle East has worked out so far. Do what said, Joe. Spend more time boffing your wife and less time legislating. You're intolerably inept and arrogant.

7 posted on 12/08/2006 3:38:18 AM PST by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma
Well, they saw J F'n K's mistake of taking both positions so now that they are back in power we're going to see two years of them taking no position.

Kerry just tried to duplicate what Bill Clinton did for 8 years. Kerry is just not as smooth.

Democrats cannot take a stand because their entire world-view is relativistic, not concrete.

8 posted on 12/08/2006 3:38:33 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Yes I know their history .. that's why they should not be allowed to take a pass


9 posted on 12/08/2006 3:38:43 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Nancy Pelosi has taken a stand.
She says that the jihadis will leave Iraq if we leave.
Can't say that's not a position. It may be completely clueless, but it is certainly a position.


10 posted on 12/08/2006 3:39:38 AM PST by Bahbah (Regev, Goldwasser and Shalit, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Yes I know their history .. that's why they should not be allowed to take a pass.

Yes, I'm sure the NY Times and CBS will hold their feet to the fire.......

11 posted on 12/08/2006 3:40:51 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I dont agree. They wont take a positions because they have read the thing and it so full of garbage even the cut and runners dont want to give any credence to it.


12 posted on 12/08/2006 3:44:35 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma

Was he for the study before he was against it?


13 posted on 12/08/2006 3:53:16 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

They used the Media Trashing of Bush to gain power back. But they KNOW that if we lose in Iraq, we are going to experience Jihad here!


14 posted on 12/08/2006 4:01:59 AM PST by Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
dims are wary of their shadow, losing power, and the hildebeast machine. They are spineless yellowdogs, in league with satan and the powers of evil!

LLS
15 posted on 12/08/2006 4:19:16 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Position or DELUSION?

LLS


16 posted on 12/08/2006 4:20:12 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
This report was everything the Dems have been yammering about for the last several years

And now they are running from it
17 posted on 12/08/2006 4:22:26 AM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The Democraps in Congress (Where a Socialist has the 51st vote in the Senate)are really the representatives of Al-Quida/Taliban interests!


18 posted on 12/08/2006 4:25:00 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Nancy Pelosi has taken a stand. She says that the jihadis will leave Iraq if we leave. Can't say that's not a position. It may be completely clueless, but it is certainly a position.

Didn't Nancy also say (minutes after the report was released) that the report proved the Bush policy was a failure? Hard for me to cipher how it can prove Bush failed but only be taken under consideration by her. Her "flipflopometer" may run at a higher RPM than Kerry's.

19 posted on 12/08/2006 4:27:09 AM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, also lies to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Democrats want to exist in some indeterminate state, much like Schrodinger's Cat. They can be whatever you want them to be, but no peeking!


20 posted on 12/08/2006 4:40:36 AM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson