Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Vote for Rudy: Why Giuliani should be president
National Review ^ | 12/18/2006 | Richard Bookhiser

Posted on 12/08/2006 2:36:29 PM PST by Uncledave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: WestVirginiaRebel

I don't know any 'hundred percenters' as liberal Alan Simpson calls them. I know some conservatives who have a number of bedrock issues, but none of them demand a politician agree with them 100% on all issues, only the bedrock issues.

If you really want to persuade, drop the name-calling. First you accused people of being 'Rudy haters'. Then, after being called on that, you resorted to more derogatory name-calling ('hundred percenters').

If you only want to give yourself some superficial superiority satisfaction, then by all means, keep up the name calling. But if you want to persuade, you'd be better served by dropping it.

Just a word to the wise.


41 posted on 12/08/2006 3:36:55 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: inkling

"Giuliani will be a great president. I'm looking forward to it".



I don't reckon you'd mind Hilary, either! I'll be damned if I can see much difference!


42 posted on 12/08/2006 3:38:00 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (BUAIDH NO BAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

If Rudy will fight the freaking War on Terror and work on Federal Spending, I'll forgive an awful lot. I despise much of what he seems to stand for, but we're not likely to get a perfect, or even really good candidate.


43 posted on 12/08/2006 3:38:14 PM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Maybe it is...but I'd rather live in reality, than dream about the glory days.


44 posted on 12/08/2006 3:41:34 PM PST by Hildy ("Death plucks my ear and says - LIVE - I am coming.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

"Are you insane? Have you been asleep...PRINCIPLED CONSERVATIVES COULD NOT EVEN WIN RE-ELECTION THIS TIME AROUND. Wake up my friends, it's a new day and if you care about your Country, you'll realize that before it's too late. And it's not too late if you don't keep waiting for someone who agrees 100% with everything you agree with. IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN".



If either Rudy, or Hilary,can win, my Country is dead anyway, time to sit in this swamp with my rifle, until I see the whites of their eyes!
When "winning" an election becomes just the same as "losing" an election, Hell, I may as well go fishing, and I will.


45 posted on 12/08/2006 3:48:09 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (BUAIDH NO BAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy

Will you discount Elkay sinks?


46 posted on 12/08/2006 3:53:04 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

R is for Rino these days it seems.

Sigh.


47 posted on 12/08/2006 3:56:35 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Barry Goldwater charged into battle on a wing and a prayer....Ronaldus maximus picked up the sword......

If Ronald Reagan could read these posts, he would wonder where our American sense of optimism had gone.

Time to gird our loins. H*ll, we have 2 years to find a candidate...a hairy, manly man with optimism and yes, courage.


48 posted on 12/08/2006 3:58:24 PM PST by sodpoodle (Human destiny - who lost the road map?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Listen up...Bush hasn't been fiscally conservative has he? He's spent like a drunken sailor, hasn't he? But look who we have on the Supreme Court. If you can't see that there's always a tradeoff, than you're living in a different world than the rest of us. If you think a Rodham Presidency would be the same thing as a Guiliani presidency you're in desperate need of mental help.


49 posted on 12/08/2006 4:00:00 PM PST by Hildy ("Death plucks my ear and says - LIVE - I am coming.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Go Rudy


50 posted on 12/08/2006 4:03:27 PM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
If he will change is stance on gun ownership I will campaign for him

No Republican is dumb enough to actively campaign for gun control.

Rudy is not going to come out as a gun-grabber. It's just common-sense.

51 posted on 12/08/2006 4:06:18 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

People forget what Hillary and a Democrat Congress can do in eight years.

Say hello to universal health care, French veto over American security, the Kyoto Protocol, selling out Israel, more judicial activists on the courts fighting America-- and for what? To protest two of three issues Rudy will get right in the end anyway through judicial appointments?

After all, Giuliani has been fiercely loyal to the party, which is something I can't say about McCain, or a lot of people here at FR, including those who want to Ross Perot us again.


52 posted on 12/08/2006 4:15:20 PM PST by JHBowden (President Giuliani in 2008! Law and Order. Solid Judges. Free Markets. Killing Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
"Principled conservatives are willing to hand the nation over to the agressive left rather than follow turncoat pretenders at a slower rate into the maw of hell."

I think that you are right, except for the part where I don't know what a "maw" is in this context.

J/K, I got the Melville quote.

BTW, I never finished reading Moby Dick. Gotta remedy that.

53 posted on 12/08/2006 4:18:40 PM PST by Radix (Don't mind me, I post dumb stuff all of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

You mean conservatives, don't you? What are Rudy's conservative values? They seem more than clear to many of us conservatives reading this article and thread and most are not Rudy haters, just strong conservatives. ACBR! (Any Conservative But Rudy!).


54 posted on 12/08/2006 4:20:52 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bushwacker777
If I want a New York Democrat then why wouldn't I just go ahead and vote for Hillary?

Well said Bushwacker777.

Just say NO to any and ALL RINOs.

55 posted on 12/08/2006 4:24:05 PM PST by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Only to good solid conservatives.


56 posted on 12/08/2006 4:24:19 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

You CAN'T be a "Rebel" if your from West Virginia.


57 posted on 12/08/2006 4:25:48 PM PST by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
You said, "After all, Giuliani has been fiercely loyal to the party,...

Does that include voting for George McGovern (ok, he was young, innocent, idealistic and incredibly naive in his late 20's...rolling eyes, yarite) and MARIO CUOMO?

He didn't just vote for CUOMO--he ENDORSED him!! Maybe you call that 'fiercely loyal' to the party--but I call it something much less.

58 posted on 12/08/2006 4:32:32 PM PST by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden

"Giuliani has been fiercely loyal to the party".



Yeah, why not, he knows where the butter on his bread comes from, I don't even want to consider what Rudy would agree to, just to keep that butter coming!
Rudy has never been "fiercely loyal" to Republican principles, I don't expect he would recognize them,if they bit him on the arse!


59 posted on 12/08/2006 4:37:47 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (BUAIDH NO BAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
The notion that someone is a "100 percenter" simply because he/she opposes a candidate who is an avowed liberal on 85% of the issues is so silly that it isn't even insulting.

When you see so-called "conservative" pushing a guy whose track record is about as liberal as you can get, you really have to wonder what the hidden agenda is here.

60 posted on 12/08/2006 4:38:12 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson