[savedbygrace]

I don't know any 'hundred percenters' as liberal Alan Simpson calls them. I know some conservatives who have a number of bedrock issues, but none of them demand a politician agree with them 100% on all issues, only the bedrock issues.

If you really want to persuade, drop the name-calling. First you accused people of being 'Rudy haters'. Then, after being called on that, you resorted to more derogatory name-calling ('hundred percenters').

If you only want to give yourself some superficial superiority satisfaction, then by all means, keep up the name calling. But if you want to persuade, you'd be better served by dropping it.

Just a word to the wise.

[Alberta's Child]

The notion that someone is a "100 percenter" simply because he/she opposes a candidate who is an avowed liberal on 85% of the issues is so silly that it isn't even insulting.

When you see so-called "conservative" pushing a guy whose track record is about as liberal as you can get, you really have to wonder what the hidden agenda is here.

[JimFreedom]

They are 100 percenters by the replies they make, and no 100 percenters are not persuadable.