While Baker does reference Israel in ways that are more relevent to Middle Eastern affairs, and irrelevent to Iraq, you may find an item or two in the 79 that you agree with.
I have read it ....anything that I agree with is still part of what the administration has basically advocated....everything else is what I have already stated...in the end...baker believes Israel should give up the Golan Heights...eventually the West Bank and East Jersusalem....pre-1967 borders...of course he does not advocate Syria/Suadi Arabia/Egypt/Lebanon-hizzbola/or the palestinians-hamas giving up anything including recognizing Israel's right to exist....in order words..he advocates Israel's demise/destruction/suicide.....
since when does a nation win wars and then fall on its sword for peace that can never exist...
if this is the way the US will aid Israel....it is akin to what Oscar Wilde once wrote..." a true friend stabs you in the front!"
what report did you read?????