Guess you should brush up on your FR etiquette, and ping me to a post you're talking about me in.
As far as brushing up on reading, my point was that Baker's references to Israel were irrelevant to Iraq, and that beyond that, you may find some things in the ISG you agree with.
President Bush is going to ignore the nonsense about Israel, and look at what deals with Iraq. That's not too hard to follow, is it?
wrong again.....Bush will ignore most of the report...the only issue that he should be addressing is how to move more troops into iraq and win the war!!! If this would have been done in the beginning and he had not tried to play for a tie and be pc...this would have been over and the troops would not be in such harms way!!!!!
Of course with most of the republicans now trying to cover their own 6's this won't happen!!!!
you seem to be such an expert....maybe even you could understand this....
and as far as pinging you...why bother.....it is quite apparent that others have concurred with the oversimplification of the report...."That's not too hard to follow, is it?"