You know what? I think
I'll bake some cookies and
wait for Bill to come home.
Anybody hungry?
Posted on 12/10/2006 8:52:59 PM PST by Mia T
Al Gore's response has to be the most laughable and pathetic... he says Bill Clinton's rape was a mistake?
...and adding that his "faith tradition" informs him that whatever Bill did, we should hate the sin and love the sinner. Shameless. (Bill would be the sinner, I think, but you never know with wacky Al he might be referring to Ms. Brodderick).
Wacky Al again, like all liberals, mock the Christian Faith, when they can invoke it for their own advantage.
Does anyone really believe the party of abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and now rape care what Jesus thinks?
Digression:
Never really understood that phrase too much, though, if we are to love the sinner then who loves the victim of the sin? and how are we supposed to love the sinner, anyway, by letting him get away with his sin?
It sounds as if they are saying:
"Oh, don't worry about that rape, mr. rapist, we love you, and you the victim or you the rapist's accusers, if you don't "love" the rapist, you're a heathen."
It seems like some kind of clever trick of falsely separating a person from their sin and accusing those who don't buy into such nonsense as being the "bad guys". If you didn't sin you wouldn't be called a sinner. "Love the sinner, hate the sin" formula, IMHO, just destroys accountability, responsibility, justice and it destroys any idea of mercy too. Doesn't sound Christian to me.
Nietzche once said Jutice is love with eyes wide open. He got it wrong, of course, Mercy is love with eyes wide open. You don't pretend you do not see how awful the sin or the sinner is or excuse it. Justice doesn't do that and without Justice you can't have or show Mercy.
Only Jesus can pull off Mercy and Justice at the same time, ie. his death on the Cross. We on the other hand must procure Justice, punishment first, then Mercy can be shown.
Mercy without Justice is not Mercy, it's a mockery of Justice and Mercy.
I'll stop ranting, Al's invocation of his "faith tradition" to exonerate Bill-the-rapist disgusted me.
Rock on chere!!!
excellent.
Gore's response disgusted me, too.
hillary is even less nimble. We must insinuate ourselves into her prescreened audiences and spring this stuff on her. And not just about the rape....
thanx :)
There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism
GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL
thanx :)
WND Les (I am the moron who asks moronic questions) Kinsolving ??? Puhleezze. I hope the Clintons fail, but I wouldn't hang my hopes on WND to tip!!!
Namesake that never was.
ping
You do excellent work; I look forward to your efforts in the coming two years. OOOOOHHHHH YYYYYEEEEEAHHHHHH!
thanx:)to and for you!!
The seven faces of hillary ........
bump
thank you :)
thx malia :)
thx Cindy :)
|
Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch (or its facile alliteration). Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing. 
In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas that have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect. If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time |
can i help?
You're very welcome Mia T.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.