TONGUE-IN-CHEEK WARNING ABOUT OVAL-OFFICE FELLATION ACTUALIZED (SPELLS TROUBLE AHEAD FOR HILLARY)

The Constitution, The Federalist Papers, The New York Times, BrookesNews.Com, hillary clinton | Mia T, Dr. Jack Wheeler

[OldFriend]

Bump

[ROTB]

>Concentrate instead on the bimbos.

LOL!

[jazusamo]

Good post and there could be physical evidence to substantiate his behavior.

[weegee]

That wasn't a tongue in Monica's cheek.

[weegee]

In a more serious vein,

"Cite Federalist No. 76. The endless phalanx of fellating females clearly demonstrates clinton's recklessness and utter disregard for the security of the country."

President Bill Clinton DID compromise national security and insult the servicemen of this country when he received oral sex from an unpaid college intern while on a phone call deploying troops.

Additionally he made a head of state wait in the Rose Garden while he received oral pleasure from same woman.

He bought off her testimony with a high paying job for which she was not qualified, courtesy of his corporate buddies. Makes you wonder how many of the other people who refused to testify against Mr. & Mrs. Clinton did so because they had been intimidated with threats of violence or offered bribes.

The Clinton administration was a sordid mess.

Thanks for your efforts, Mia.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

That anyone with half a brain and one-fourth the evidence still regards these two as credible, sane and competent is quite amazing.

"SONNY" CALLAHAN + BILL CLINTON'S CINDY SHEEHANS

[FlyVet]

Un. Freaking. Believable.

Could the clintons touch anything without turning it into corrupt filth?

I wonder if anyone in the talk radio world has gotten hold of this?

[Pagey]

Love the Epilogue Post. I remember reading about this but hadn't saved it until now. Thank You Mia!!!

[Pagey]

Love the Epilogue Post. I remember reading about this but hadn't saved it until now. Thank You Mia!!!

[Ouderkirk]

I actually want Hillary to run. It will be hilarious to watch her try to deflect the mountain of evidence against her and her shameless husband.

My only reservation is, that her "handlers" will never let anyone with a probing question, ask it, nor will the media lackeys demand from her a hard answer to any probing question, were it to be asked. The resultant drumbeat will be; they're attacking her because she's a woman. Instead of; they're attacking her because she is a principal in an ongoing criminal conspiracy.

[Mia T]

That's the question. We must nail her ourselves. We must insinuate ourselves into her prescreened audiences, etc.

WILL HILLARY CLINTON RUN?
COMBINATORIAL GAME THEORY MAY PROVIDE THE ANSWER

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

;)

[Mia T]

You're welcome, Pagey. :)

[Mia T]

Indeed. How can any reasonable person trust these two with our national security? With the future of our children?

Would anyone hire these two as household help?

[ameribbean expat]

if hillary can't/won't stand up to a philandering husband, who's going to trust her with standing up to terrorists?

[Lee'sGhost]

NOTHING wil ever come of this. The dims will not tarnish their saint and the repugs are too weak willed.

[Nancee]

This one is too funny!

:-)

[Enterprise]

Bump